Tales From A Disheveled-Rotten Brain: Part One

I suppose what is true is true and what is real is real, but if we stop to believe only what we're told, we never learn the new. However by learning the new we are disobeying and in that process, we must discover the new, breaking yet another rule to strive deeper for the truth and in this path we hit more barriers. Which path is correct? Will we ever know? Unless we take the path less traveled, which path would that be? The science path (learning the truth) or the path were the truth is "given to us". Is the path where the truth is given to you, religion? Am I criticizing the Church? In Religion you are told to accept only what the Bible has to provide. If you question the Bible you are taking the first path.... which is the path less traveled? How do you choose once you know, assuming you ever find out. I don't know which path, I myself would take, if I knew. I think I am leaning towards Science, but then I am "disregarding" religion. And that is not my intent.... because my life is tightly knit with religion. Must you only choose one of the two paths? I'm afraid so, unless you can split your body apart and walk both roads. I believe there is some kind of God, but how do I disregard my God to study unbiased Science? I fear there is no way, science is always biased: trying to disprove God or prove him and "creation". So maybe the two paths can coincide to create a "highway". But I think not. This is not a test: no wrong answer. So go ahead, make your choice, there is only so much time....