Ditch the ads, upload images and much more - upgrade today from 5.95/month!
Read Contests Groups Learn Forums Store Help
 

In Answer To a Guess I May Be a Zen Buddhist

In fact I am a Thelemite.

When I was younger, I read and re-read 101 Zen Koans, along with the Book of Ten Bulls, a book I later repurchased, if not in such a prima edition as my mother's were.

zen, btw, literally means "instant (as in lightning)". Lightning, when it "strikes", has been shown by fast frame photography, to in fact involve a short bolt leaping up from a charged ground to meet a long electrical induction in a charged atmosphere, commonly called "the lightning bolt". So, Zen Buddhism concerns itself with the Instant of Enlightenment, aiming to produce critical moments of Progress Towards, and ultimately the Tipping Point of, Enlightenment.

For me, and I did not realise what had happened until years later, after the effect had settled in, my Enlightenment lasted 3 days. It was not an Instant thing, at least in the vulgar sense: it was of an Eternal (atemporal) nature, so those 3 days passed as if in One Instant.

That said simply to satisfy the Enlightenment statement, something of no greater concern to another than the simple fact of it having been made, and of many a lesser concern, even to that instant which is zero.

So far as the Buddhist precepts go, I profer my Translation of the Four Noble Truths along side the more usual translations:
1) Existence is Suffering; Existence is Experienced.
2) The Cause of Suffering is Attachment; The Cause of Experience is Interaction.
3) There is Release from Suffering; There is Know Need for Interaction.
4) The Path to Release from Suffering is the Noble Eight Fold Path of the Buddhist; The Paths to Know Need for Interaction are the Noble Eight Fold Paths of the Thelemites.

One might render concise the Noble Eight Fold Path(s) as "Correct Action", Action being understood as occuring not only in a Physical sense, but on any plane where Interaction occur, and Correct as being more verbal than a noun.

That the Moment One lives in involves the Past, the Present and the Future, the Basic Tenses of Time in the English language (Arabic, eg, has only two, while Greek has five) is I think an important point, lest wee forget.

So, no, I am not a Zen Buddhist. Tibetan Buddhism interests me more, but neither am I from that School of Enlightenment, mine own being best understood in light of Ancient Egyptian Magick and that Branch of the Tree of Voodoo I call ApaiedA Zulu Vudu.

But enough of such Schooling
is Enlightenment enough;
Before I was Enlightened, a Mountain was a Mountain.
While I sought Enlightenment, a Mountain was no Mountain.
Enlightened, a Mountain was a Mountain once again.
And, during the Enlightenment, a Mountain was a Social Agitation for a Nation.

Master Anarchy

Lautreamont, in contemplating more,could never have foreseen?

    : , Your review:

    Comment Suggestion: What is your your first impression?
    Line numbers  • Invite them to read
    : no Cost: 0 free left 0 points, You have (?)

Comments

1 - 7 of 7
  • Very sage advise

    hm I think I am still in the Alan watts school of thought

    "Trying to define yourself is like trying to bite your own teeth."

    at least for the moment, and we only have this moment
    so where the hour is late, I will sick to that at least for the moment

    • Enough is Enough; A Mountain is a Mountain.

      Enlightenment is not so much about defining one's selfd as realising the Process of Nirvana (lit. "annihilation"), which, in its early stages of success, exceeds by neither under nor overwhelming but by extrawhelming, going beyond, exceeding, and so discovering that which remains, much as a traveller in the desert finds himself defined by nothing but the horizon that wil always be there.

      But Alan Watts is a nice man definitely, and a worthy scholar of Religion and Spiritual Endeavour, a veritable mountain of a man.

      Also, one should differentiate Enlightenment from its further refinement: the Mahayana Buddhist only goes so far, thenleaves off, or begins topropagandise that Enlightenment is Enough.

      I like repeating moments, as did Nietzsche.

      For Now,
      Master Anarchy

  • I just wanted to say that I believe Buddhism has some great ideas in it. I have listened to a few recorded sessions of speakers on it. The words point to truth.

    I especially like Adyashanti. Although he doesn’t talk directly about it, he has a Buddhist background. For me, he triggers the opening of the mind. This senryu poem was inspired by reading his book:
    http://allpoetry.com/poem/5132773

    • Out of Ideas

      "Out of Enlightenment
      Come ideas
      To the unenlightened
      Who realise not
      That they are Enlightened
      But place improper wait on it."

      Bodhi Faust.

  • I agree mostly with the Buddhist ideas. But, I really do not know a whole lot about it. There are a couple of things I wonder about, other than that, it sounds like a great philosophy of all inclusive love.

    I heard that Buddhists believe that women will have a harder time with spiritual growth because they are more closely associated with the earth in their monthly cycles. This is probably not what Buddha said, just something the followers made up. Anyway, they don’t appear to treat women as equals.

    Also, do Buddhist believe in angels, awaken beings that help us see the truth when asked?

    I understand that you are Thelemite, so these beliefs, perhaps you do not support.

    When Buddhists pray, who do they pray to? They are all part of God. I guess I don’t really pray to God any more. I’m praying to Higher Part of us that is awakened.

    • Buddhism is not a Philosophy of all-inclusive love. It is a Philosophy based on the Four Noble Truths and the 8 Fold Path. More than that, it is a Practice of Philosophy, rather than a Philosophy.

      So far as treatment of women as equals goes, it would be unfair to cast Buddhism in that light. And one may ask, in this day and age where women still do not get equal pay for equal work in our own society, who does. Even among Thelemites I find sexist dogs.

      There are at least 3 schools of Buddhism, 3 main streams: the Great Path (Mahayana), the Little (Hinayana), and the Sorceror's Path. The Great Path look toward a Spreading of Enlightenment; the Little Path look toward Other Tasks, enlightened; the Sorceror's Path, enlightened or no, may not differ in one whit from that which an unenlightened person lives.

      As a Thelemite, I believe .. well, is it fair to say "as a Thelemite"? "There is no law beyond Do What Thou WIlt". "Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law".

      Buddhists do not pray. Not if they are actually walking the eight fold path. Then it is a matter of correct action. And if they are not walking the eight fold path, then they are not actively Buddhist, it being a practice not a religion.

      MA

1 - 7 of 7