Ditch the ads, upload images and much more - upgrade today from 5.95/month!
Read Contests Groups Learn Forums Store Help
 

bass


I

3:10 am and thoughts flow like a walking
bass.
you are the rhythm that agitates.

acoustic,
because electric is rocky and angry and i’m not
angry
anymore.

melody is irrelevant;
we are destined to a life of
swing,

a life where happy endings are
sent to the back of the
bus and sad stories are woven into
tales of
tri-pel-et
woe.


II

love could never write
jazz
because jazz was too
busy writing love,
and we were too busy writing
papers
about god
and evolutionary biology
to notice.

Author notes

02/24-25/2009 during one of many all-nighters that week

I'm not really sure what I'm doing with this. I might separate it into two separate poems? The tone in the two sections is entirely different, but I kind of like them together because the theme and metaphor are obviously the same. Definitely let me know what you think!

    I plan to revise this poem: please leave constructive criticism!
    : , Your review:

    Comment Suggestion: What is your your first impression?
    Line numbers  • Invite them to read
    : no Cost: 0 free left 0 points, You have (?)

Comments

1 - 6 of 6

  • MountainGirl
    August 19

    Edit | Reply
    Do you listen to Ani Difranco? I felt like it had a bit of ani-flow/rhythm to it...that's a good thing

    • March Muffin
      August 21
      Edit | Reply
      Yes I do! I love her, actually. That's pretty much the best comparison any has ever made of my writing to anything. Thank you so much!


  • a59teeth
    May 13

    Edit | Reply

    hmmm

    i also like these two together. infact, i could not imagine them apart after reading them this way! the whole of this is great. i Love the last stanza or II stanza! my favorite lines were, 'love could never write jazz because jazz was too busy writing love,'-wonderful words!! maybe they're my favorite because i love jazz. who knows! this is wonderful! i see no awkward areas and would hate to see these two parts separated!!


  • bachelorette silver member
    April 1

    Edit | Reply
    I love how 'triplet' is split into the syllables musicians give it (takes me back).
    I will have to disagree with silverscent and state that I want these two parts to stay together. Not only do they share a theme, but the sound of both (even though the second part is more in-depth) is the same. Separate, I don't think either would feel complete. Have you thought about giving them Roman numerals instead of positioning the second part off-screen from the first?
    I love every line of this, from the brilliant and grappling opening lines to the sardonic, truthful end. Bookmarking.
    -K

    • March Muffin
      April 5
      Edit | Reply
      I really like the roman numeral idea. I think I'm going to try this and see how that works. Thanks! And obviously, I'm glad you enjoyed it.


  • silverscent gold member
    March 28

    Edit | Reply
    I would like them as two separate poems. Why? Mainly because I think it would make the second part ( from "love could...") stronger to be without the previous part. Same goes for the first part, you may be able to edit slightly if you don't feel it's finished, but I certainly think it would sit better without the bit on the bottom. But hey, that's just my opinion.
    I really enjoyed both (I did read them as separate poems if I'm honest.) I might be inclined to say I liked the second more, but that's just my preference.

    Thanks for sharing.

1 - 6 of 6