What a beautiful day it is today. How can I focus on philosophy on a day like this? Far better to look out of my window, watch the lazy, silver-rimmed clouds move inch-by-inch across their blue field… the delicate, skeletal birch trees waiting patiently for spring… the angular patience of a house-gable… the occasional disturbance of a sparrow in flight, in counterpoint to it all. Everything is beautiful in the garden, everything is serene, and the sun comes and goes, changing the patterns of shade, bestowing moments of warmth and light, as though they were smiles or kisses. Yes, far better to lean upon the sill and day-dream.
After all, what is there beyond “cogito ergo sum” – I am aware, therefore I exist? Awareness proves existence, but it proves nothing else. Nothing else at all. There is nothing frightening in that, in simply knowing that these clouds, these trees, the gable, the sparrows are here in my mind, and may be nowhere else. The scene is still beautiful, and beauty is a permanent thought, if a transient image.
Tathagata: “With our thoughts we make the world.”
Marcus Aurelius: “Your life is what your thoughts make it.”
Does anything exist outside myself? Even if it does, am I capable of knowing it’s nature? Even if I am capable, am I further capable of communicating with certainty what I know? My mind recognises here the principles of Gorgias, as explained by Sextus Empiricus; but are these principles any more real than the pictures I have of the clouds and the trees? Enough questions – let me go back to watching, to painting the world inside my head with pictures. It is all I want to do today.
The scene is moving, with calm slowness, with a kind of banal gravitas; and yet the sparrows seem to delight in defying it. It gives me pleasure to anthropomorphise them into tiny jesters, playing havoc with little bits of the serenity of the universe. They are in here, but they seem out there. What a marvellous universe I keep here in my mind!
As the sole being in this universe, it pleases me to populate it with these images. It pleases me to go and fetch myself a cup of tea and something to eat. It seems that I have to do this in order to continue to exist – though I have no proof about that. After all, awareness proves existence, but nothing else; awareness doesn’t define existence, awareness doesn’t define itself. In the phrase “I think therefore I am”, not only “think” and “am” defy further analysis, but also “I”. For that matter, even “therefore” is a little suspect too!
To pass from this, to go forward into the place in which the cup of tea and sandwich sustain me, and are part of a natural process of cause and effect by which I am able to go on being aware and existing, I have to make a big assumption. I have to take a giant leap of faith, and take it for granted that outside myself – my mind – other things really do exist, and that they follow laws with hard edges, laws with context, content, and consequence. I repeat that this is a matter of faith, because it can never be a matter of proof. As such, it must serve to humble the most vociferous and arrogant materialist, the most militant atheist, the most rigorous rationalist; each one of them, consciously or unconsciously, will have taken a step of faith – if they themselves exist. It humbles all of us.
The shocking thought remains, however, that it may not be a leap of faith at all, but a step into madness, an acquiescence with an intangible, improbable “world” out there, within which my sparrow-jesters fly not at a whim, but because of aerodynamics, instinct, and a million million impulses, an ever-tumbling line of dominos, stretching back into infinity, each one whispering “cause – effect” until the words become meaningless. Infinity is one of the most uncomfortable things I perceive, after I have made that leap of faith.
The next big assumption I have to make, if I take that step, is that my observations and my interpretation of those observations, can be relied upon as evidence, and can be used to form judgments and make pronouncements about what else may exist. Can I trust my senses? Can I trust my analytical ability? Again, every materialist, atheist, and rationalist, must make the same assumption. There is no proof. And the next big assumption after that, is to live my life according to the rules I perceive, from my analysis of what else may exist.
How can this be safe?
And yet I do it. I predicate a whole universe upon this. What remains to be said? I am quite clearly insane.
But it seems to work. Bread satisfies hunger, my body goes on until I feel hunger again, which more bread satisfies. If I interrupt that, I starve and die. If it is so or not so, I have no way of knowing, because none of the terms I use – bread, hunger, satisfy, starvation, death – has an absolute definition. But I keep right on doing it and, as I said, it seems to work.
No, there is nothing more to say. It is time I got back to the serious business of the day, the business that these thoughts interrupted, the business of the pictures here, of the clouds and the trees, the sparrows in flight, the spring day I have allowed to form in my mind. To be sure, they are beautiful, whatever that means.
I wonder if I have seen the truth. If I have, will I know that I have? If I have, or know that I have, will any mark be left of my knowing it after I have moved on? How foolish it all seems, how pointless the chase after illusory wisdom is, how much effort is put into philosophy that could be better spent.
The Mahabharata: “Just as the footprint of birds flying in the sky and of fish swimming in the water may not be seen, so is the going of those who have realised the truth.”
The Heart Sutra: “Om gate gate paragate parasamgate bodhi svaha.”
Enough – you are all tired of this. Let me tell you a story instead.
One day a man began to search a large field, in which he was convinced a great treasure lay. Fairly soon, to his delight, he saw something glittering in the grass. He ran towards it, and found that it was a piece of gold. So he picked it up, and continued to search. After a while he saw something else glittering, and excitedly ran towards it. He found that it was a piece of silver, but when he picked it up, he realised that in his excitement he had dropped the gold. He cursed his luck, but consoled himself with the silver, and continued to search. After a little more time, he saw something else glittering in the grass, and ran towards it as eagerly as had run towards the gold and silver. He found it was a piece of bronze, but as he bent down to pick it up, he realised he had dropped the piece of sliver somewhere. He cursed again, more bitterly, and resumed his search with fury. Soon he spotted something else glistening in the grass and, hoping that it might be his lost gold or silver, he ran towards it. When he picked it up, not only did he realise that he no longer had his piece of bronze, but that this last thing was only a piece of wood; maybe the sunlight had been reflected from its smooth surface, or the dew had formed a sheen on it, and thus fooled his eyes. Disgusted and cursing, he flung it from him, and left the field.
The story may end there, although some people say that at that moment he realised that he should have gone away content with the piece of gold, and not continued in his avarice. Others say that he realised that his whole search had been illusory and meaningless, and that he had gained some wisdom in the end, which was much more valuable to him than the gold, or the silver, or any other treasures he had found and lost.
Others again say that after he had gone, another man entered the field, picked up the piece of wood, and carried it away; and with the piece of wood he carried all the burdens of the whole world for ever.
It is simply a story. A story may have many endings or none at all, but it is still only a story, and serves little purpose. You must excuse me – I now have serious business to attend to. I have a garden to look at, here or out there as the case may be. The sun seems to have come out again, and to be shining steadily. It is a beautiful day – far too beautiful for philosophy.
Author notes
Entered to make up the numbers.
1518 words
A contest entry
- AP Philosopher Poet in "The battle of the bards" Open to all by Amazira.
2200 points, ended May 5, 6 entries
Bronze trophy winner
• next poem in this contest, remove from contest
Comments
1 - 21 of 21
-
Confusingly, this was supposed to have one of these.

-
how i wish you and i could
garden and talk philosophy
i read
every word of this, and it is a wonderful
piece for the contest. Keeping my fingers
crossed. Love, Lane

-
-
But kc, I hate gardening. Perhaps I could sit and sip lemonade while you do the gardening - we could still talk.
-
-
undoubtably the most insightful and lifting things I have read. My compliments to your enlightened thoughts and knowledge
Joe

-
-
Och it was just a wee doodle, Joe.
-
-
You did more than make up the numbers, you made sense,I could read and digest every word you were saying in ( and I don't mean this rudely ), in the simplest of words.You took me off on your thought waves whilst contemplating in your garden.Ah!!!! I feel relaxed and happy on this oh so beautiful day, Ros


-
-
I'm glad, Ros.
-
-
Strong food for thought and I love the air about it. Great entry. This judge is moved...
~The Inc." -
-
Thank you, Inc.
-
-
Oh you exist all right and thank god (or whoever) for it!!! I knew reading your essay would be the bright spot in my morning
now I must go and feed my cat, who also exists and I know it cause she's mewing her impatient hungry existence in my face.
laurie


-
-
Cats' existence seems to be independant of anything else. I am convinced that if I didn't exist, somewhere a cat still would. Don't ask me why, however, because I have no idea.
Thank you, Laurie.
M
-
-
dear mairi, mon âmie
I am truly impressed and touched by your essay, and my words are not superficial in order to flatter your ego (of whose existance I doubt) ...
the trickster in you (I''m on a trickster-trip recently, have you noticed ?) tries to tell us that you are just a simple lady watching birds and that's about it ...
yet, you leave invisible footprints in the hearts of those who read in between the lines ... this already, shows of great humility ...
you masterfully hide deepest truth (transcending even philosophy as such) in simple words that seem to have bloomed on this page, by coincidence ...
yet, coincidence they are not ...
your gift you offered us here through your outstanding entry, is that of allowing our mind to fade - instead of nourishing it with concepts and thought-food ... it tells us : "look, right here and now, there is no problem ... the happiness you are hoping to gain in a future time and faraway place, exist before your eyes ... in your eyes ... behind your eyes ... you ARE that beauty that you see ..."
I love you, wise woman

maa

-
-
... and yet... really... I am not wise.
-
-
This may be nonsense, Mairi...but it's sophisticated and inspired nonsense! Very clever and amusing.
Bill

-
-
It may be nonsense, but Jings aw michty, it's SCOTTISH nonsense!

Thanks, Bill.
-
-
Wow! What am I gonna do with this?
You gave me a headache. With your sly twists of the tongue you say so much. Your understanding and your writing skills are obvious. You betray yourself to be both a philosopher and a poet. Your premise shyly peeks out every once in a while. Your quotes are good choices. Could you please tell me how am I going to criticize this? Its a great dance that you did back and forth from your prose to your philosophy. I wonder if the other judges will feel the same. Thank you for your entry.


-
-
I have a premise? Oops, I'd better go and erase it before anyone notices

OK, I'll admit I had a good time framing this piece.
M
-
-
I have read it twice and enjoyed it both times. It does seem like calling football ballet, but if you squint just right and play some Stravinsky in the background...
Being an extreme skeptic, I reject, "I am aware, therefore, I exist." as many terms are not satisfactorily defined. I would only allow for, "Perception exists." the term I is to difficult to describe to make it meaningful. But that is just me.
This is a brilliant philosophy of non-philosophy. Pyrrho would have loved it just after bathtime. Hume would have had it tatooed on his wife's buttocks. Marcello Truzzi would have shrugged his shoulders and gone to get a hotdog. Ha ha ha. I am not really sure what your philosophy is, but you certainly relate it in the most remarkably poetic and colorful way imaginable. I love it. Good luck in the contest.

-
-
I'm b*ggered if I know what it is either, but that's half the fun. And fun - in the absence of any possible serious conclusion - is what I was aiming for here. The whole subject could get too damn po-faced. I think I'm a Harpo-Marxist.
"Perception exists" is all very well, but it requires a perceiver to say it. Back to square 1. I think Oolon Colluphid would enjoy reading this, myself.
M
-
-
I am delighted to see you here, my mairi ...

I will have to read your essay with attention and care, and will be back to comment as soon as I have finished mine ...
bonne soirée, ma très chère et précieuse âmie (the little roof on the "a" makes you a friend of my soul
)
maa
-
-
Ton "âmie" - ça me plait beaucoup! Quel jeu de mots!
Reviens, chère...
(Oh dear, I must stop using Cajun French)
Come back and read through - it's nonsense, but you will be welcome.
-
1 - 21 of 21









