If you could find the figure-
the other artist to draw you,
out of context- objectify-
see in a biased, a personal light,
or, in the light of a tree
or of a city lamp-
only not- complete and ready formed.
If that other figure, other artist-
stepping out of molded light- could strip,
bare utterly the body and,
make pliant the unbendable
sheerly by a force of vision.
Do all of this to see one in,
the tangle of a sheet or stretch of water,
or in the quickness of a glance,
so that the personal (formed
of mores, corrections, words,
and faulted attitudes) could leap out of focus,
escape onto another plane- exist.
at last with some autonomy
this kind of gift-
more potent than a resurrection
or resuscitation-
is what makes of a man
a hero, savior; all of this,
This which turns a flame into a purging fire
whose charring
can be seen only from the corner of the eye,
obliquely-
or in the seconds flicker of a lens.
by destruction only can we
save another-
love is secondary-
Author notes
I'd always prefer a deep and scalding criticism to short slick placation
Please tell me what you think
Comments
-
My only criticism would be that this is so personal in thought and vision it makes it difficult in itself to decipher but that in itself seems to be in essence what it is trying to acheive. A very interesting concept and very well written



