Ditch the ads, upload images and much more - upgrade today from 5.95/month!
Read Contests Groups Learn Forums Store Help
 

Babalon Working or How Jack Parsons Helped Me Love The Bomb (An Interactive Treatise)

Missing image
I was born August 7th, 1974 in the year of the tiger.
I will not tell you the hour because my rising sign is my secret.
My mother both abandoned me, and then later resurfaced
to have a highly charged Oedipal relationship with me.
She claimed we were lovers and brother and sister, husband,
and wife in past lives. I thought my mother was crazy,
perhaps she is, perhaps she isn't. I know I could never be that
way to my children, or any human for that matter,
but I had to admit that it made me stronger
and smarter on certain levels that proved to save my life.

In 1947 the first UFO's in North America (saucer shaped that is)
were sighted over the Cascade Mountains.
http://www.unknowncountry.com/mindframe/opinion/?id=199
Directly before this Jack Parson's attempted to
summon Babalon. This treatise is an exploration into what
that has to do with me, what that means,
and what any of this has to do with you. Read this
http://www.rense.com/general75/wrus.htm
And you'll decide yourself. Although probably wonder how
Flying Saucers, Zionism, Babalon -- Jack Parsons, you,
me, ALL of us have something in common. It’ll scare you; you’ll evolve, trust me.
Be the scorpion to my frog. We share the earth
with powerful entities.

Ever since I can recall I have been confronted by the supernatural.
My name is based in it, my demeanor
demands it. I've even bumped into a couple of grey aliens
myself both physically, and in astral travels.
From the moment I first began studying magic,
until now, has been only a precursor to what will soon be happening
on magical levels around the planet. A great shedding of snakeskin...
The ability for men to kill other men in the
name of god is in itself black magic. It destroys the entire lives
of both families on both sides, enslaving souls. There are no winners.
If we won WWI, and WWII, (the war to end all wars)
Why are there more wars now than ever?
And more dangerous weapons now than ever before?

If we can send men to the moon, and supposedly have, why
have we not gone back, why did we not set up shop?
That's very unlike America to not stay in a place it has once
occupied. Just look at the Philippines, Japan, Germany,
and the Middle East to test that fact.
You ever see the Australian Navy in San Francisco?
Well, it's quite common to see the American
Navy emptying boats in every port around the world.
That includes the Army and the Air force.

What is on the dark side of the moon? And why does
Jack Parsons have a crater named after him there?
Jack Parsons, now here was the real deal. Some called him the
antichrist. A James Dean high on witchcraft and rocket science.
The quintessential magician/scientist dead at 37 due to a
supposed accident involving a fulminate of Mercury,
and some other explosives. This guy starts NASA, so to speak,
our space program, and invents solid rocket fuel.

He started JPL (Jack Parson Lab.), and at the same time
was the head of an OTO lodge (Agape). Unfortunately
the majority of people reading this wouldn't know what that meant
if it grew inside your ass, and ate you for breakfast.
This young man was Aliester Crowley's adept on a certain level.
Jack Parsons decoded the book of the law.
And here’s the real kicker, he did it with L. Ron Hubbard as
His magical scribe! Tell me that’s not far out. In the middle
of the Mojave desert.

Jack Parson’s inherited a beautiful mansion in Pasadena from
His maternal grandfather. In his twenties and early thirties he
rented out rooms to various bohemians that answered his ads
in the paper “Room for rent”. It was not uncommon to see
Actors, writers, and scientists mingling about at the Parson’s
Estate chatting about magic, and affairs of state, or the arts.

Another fascinating note is that Parsons never graduated
from high school! Nor did he have a degree from
a university. He had taken a few classes here and there,
but never found stability in scholastic establishments.
Now here is a guy that invents a solid rocket
fuel mixture stable enough for us to base a space program and
military missile program on. Yet, Jack belonged to no fraternity,
no alumni group. Every nuke we have pointed in every
direction has a little bit of Parson’s magic in 'em.

Parsons was an autodidact in the truest sense of the word.
I had no idea what that word meant until I was 25, and a man named
David told me that I was an autodidact. It means someone that’s self
Educated. Jack Parsons had some how self educated himself to an
8 year college level or more in the areas of physics and chemistry.
Here we have a juvenile delinquent running to science and knowledge,
as a means to rebel coupled with an astute secret life of metaphysics.

Jack Parson’s was not only an amazing scientist, but he was an
immaculate writer. His book Freedom is a Two-edged sword
(a collection of essays) is as amazing a read to me than anything
I can ramble off from the greatest writers of all time. It is steeped
in patriotism, and American freedom. Yet has the candor of Voltaire
and the rebellious discipline of Thomas Jefferson or Alexander Hamilton.
It was clear to me that if Jack Parson’s was the anti-christ? I’d hate to meet Christ.

I always get a weird buzz in my head when I contemplate the fact
that indeed Christianity, Catholicism, and Zionism have all been
infiltrated by the forces of evil. They control everything
you see, smell, hear, touch, and feel, to the extent that you live in a
matrix of consumer dollar bent bliss, and work, and death.
However, don’t believe it because it is a trap. Be brave, but read this
http://www.antiwar.com/orig/pilger.php?articleid=3702
I am here to open up your eyes, you will need to understand
How things work before I go on.

Jack had quite a few odd relationships in his short lifetime.
In fact, L. Ron Hubbard, the 'beardless messiah' or what I like to
call him the 'confidence man burrito supremo' irrefutably, and matter of fact,
stole Parson's girl and his money on a business proposition gone bad, and
went to Florida. Where Jack had to go himself in pursuit, and get the
authorities involved and actually
cast a few spells of his own to get a modicum of his money back,
and some peace of mind. This of course is all after the Babalon Workings.
And can be proved by biographies in existence and legal papers. Of course
the scientology camp claim L. Ron was on a mission from Naval intelligence
to break up a black magic ring in Pasadena. Yes, picture it, L. Ron Hubbard,
all alone... fighting evil for the U.S. Navy and Americans everywhere, please,
while doing illegal activities of his own in his own interest?

It was not long after that that L. Ron began plotting out the details for one of
the strangest cults on the planet, the scientologists. One need only see
Tom Cruise bounce around, smile, and continue to pretend he's not just a little odd.
Add in their uniforms and their methods for retrieving their souls from the aliens
controlling this planet, and it's not hard to note how far gone these sheep really are.
It's not because I am an infamous Hollywood hustler that
I know the sordid backgrounds of the stars and occult leaders,
of both past and present, it's just because I was a well read prostitute, and not a sucker,
no pun intended. However, on a sour note, I think
the scientologists are onto something although
in the wrong direction. They got the alien thing
and the demonic ignorance aspect pretty close.
But please, people that need a group mind like that
to survive are weak, because they give it all up to their
living gods, the idols, the stars, the vision!
RELIGION, is all bad. Purposely cocca, invented
to control your money and your mind and your life
and ... Your death.

I mean, who are we kidding? David Geffen is currently casting
doubt over Hillary Clinton's run for presidency because of her husband's past
sexual adventures? Isn't that the pot calling the kettle black? Geffen is a professional
purchaser of young men for paid sexual favors. Practically one a day, and I should know,
I've had dinner with him twice. Hollywood, the media, and politics along with weird religions
like scientology and Zionism control the movie industry, and the sources for where you get your
information down to the printed paper. And I'm beginning to think those guys don't
even realize it. That's just scary. Who's running the show? The rothschilds, Britian?
OIr something else. Could it be Satan.
Is America itself Babalon the scarlot lady, the new Atlantis
Every American's terror and anger being channeled magically
at differeny people on the planet? A killing machine
with, I might add, a taco bell and a bowling alley equipped
aircraft carrier, and not one but probably a couple dozen.

So what is it then? What turns some people into rocket scientists and other
into serial killers? Jack Parsons is an extraordinary case study for me in particular
because of all the shared similarities: It's quite rare to encounter an individual that has
had a sexual relationship with their mother on a level that isn't rape or abuse,
but more about shared loneliness and mutual isolation. Also, I find it startling
to read about an individual so completely left field and right field and center
field all at the same time while being able to exit and enter other foreign field
of influence. In other words Someone that could write, orate, be physically
charming, function on social levels, and be a mad scientist at the same time,
while practicing detail saturated and dangerous Enochian magic.

Jack Parsons was organized and trained enough to deal with complex chemistry
and explosives with no formal education or training. He was taken seriously by
the government and learning institutions both in our country and in Israel and
Mexico (well at least until they got what they wanted from him) enough for them
to hire and pay him 'well' for his research. Simultaneously, here was a man that
was well read and versed in very archaic fields, metaphysics, numerology,
geometry, and science fiction. Here is a individual that read the book of the law by
Crowley, and literally 'got it'. Not to mention a man
that really applied science and understanding to a field
such as magic where controlled experiment is subject
to fantastic interpretations.
But that's just scratching the surface.

In a list

Please tell me what you think

    : , Your review:

    Comment Suggestion: What is your your first impression?
    Line numbers  • Invite them to read
    : no Cost: 0 free left 0 points, You have (?)

Comments

1 - 18 of 18

  • Annastacia
    October 11, 2007

    Edit | Reply
    Jeremi,Wow, I couldn't stop reading this even if I tried. It was incredible, fascinating. I want to read more. I am assuming you have written more I just need to delve through your work and trust me I will.

    About the links:
    Link 1. Wow, I am blown away and completely fascinated and intrigued by this article. I know about Jack Parsons, but everyone in the astronomy community knows of his contributions there, I was not aware of all of the other interesting details of his life. And reading further beyond the link that you provided was quite enlightening.
    Link 2. Led me to an article about Diego Garcia: I was ignorant on these facts about Diego Garcia. It makes me ashamed and sad that my father was stationed there for a year back in the 80's. The government will always blow in and take over giving no concern to the lives at stake, and the sad thing is we elect these idiots.(but they are just puppets)

    I am intrigued by your mind.
    Anna


  • Ifeelasthough
    September 9, 2007
    Edit | Reply
    I really love this poem. I can personally identify with it, and the structure of the language is similar to some of my own writings. It scared me, then seduced me, then it entranced me. LoL.
    I enjoyed the narrator's coincidental history and timeline with Jack Parsons. The first two lines seem familiar... are they from something?
    You hinted at the future of the narrator in the first stanza, but never come back to it.
    I would like to see a better transition on the first line of the second stanza.
    I also loved the narrator's commentary on "It'll scare you; you'll evolve, trust me. Be the scorpion to my frog." It seemed to give the narrator character.
    You referenced Pink Floyd and Tom Cruise, but that is your only pop culture reference. Perhaps you could do more of them, especially when you reference Americans and the military?
    My favorite line: "A James Dean high on witchcraft and rocket science."
    One should never, ever use the phrase "another fascinating note" in a person's biography. Ever.
    I would like to know more about his collection of essays.
    I resent the line "It was clear to me that if Jack Parsons' was the antichrist, I'd hate to meet Christ." Don't get me wrong, I'm as neopagan as 'kids' come these days, but it feels like a low blow to Christianity. Not very academic for such a straightforward piece.
    Here's a thought: How would one sum up "I am here to open up your eyes, you will need to understand How things work before I go on"
    Repetition alert: You used the word "own" twice in the tenth(?) stanza. Pet peeve, sorry.
    A quick ending for a long-winded piece. Perhaps something a little more conclusive in terms of the narrator's relationship to Jack Parsons?
    "But that's just scratching the surface."
    Thanks for a great poem. Much appreciated.


  • crystallynnbradford
    September 6, 2007
    Edit | Reply
    Very long and interesting piece


  • Lute
    August 31, 2007
    Edit | Reply
    oopsers. Also focus. Hillary Clinton, and sexual relationships are off topic and could be covered, as they relate to the central issue in footnotes.


  • Lute
    August 31, 2007

    Edit | Reply
    Odd that I have never heard of Jack Parsons, I shall investigate. Probably has to do with the anti-spin of the propaganda machine.

    the skein of truth--think of it as sorta like the 3d representations of space-time, as a fabric, not to mention those dimensions which we can only guess at. It is not a matter of unravelling, no rather, it is coming to the nodes, the intersections which we recognize in our souls. The knowledge outstrips our ability to acquire it, at least entire, it may be that which awaits us--any "system" which purports to enlighten us is automatically suspect. The nodes, are interpreted and screened through systems, the need is to experience them as directly as our sentience will allow, without interference, we acquire certain facts through interaction, but the necessary nuance or truth behind that collection of data is something that can only be grokked by personal interaction with essence. As it is, Being and essence will not coalesce, without the renunciation of ego and or dissolution.

    As to the threads, be they mystic, extraterrestrial, scientific, philosophic, psychological, cosmological, or subatomic--there is no question as to their existence, it is a matter of recognition, of acceptance, again, we cannot hope to understand the total complexity, we can only extract that which applies to us personally--the truth is out there, but it is too big to hold in our hands, we are left with bits and pieces, which being held by a man are very dangerous bits in the wrong hands.

    Do please continue these extrapolations. By way of literary criticism of course, I should say to compose it as prose, so that the readers mind is eased of the burden of searching for poetry, in what is essentially an essay. Footnotes, son, back it up, make it look like it should read--not that the ruling class will ever take anything seriously which they would regard as subverting their reason for existence, but don't make it easy for them. Use their own research against them, and not just the brash outsiders who rose up and flamed out, Kerouac, Tesla, your friend Mr. Parsons.

    Always expand, never contract, never go on the defensive, and never retreat. Be aware that you will come to the Last Stand and there will be no way to surrender, or capitulate.

    Sometimes, if you're lucky you will live a long time,
    see Jean Genet, Cocteau, Sartre, And Pound.


  • TheDjinn
    July 31, 2007

    Edit | Reply
    Ok, not believing in the meeting aliens thing makes my view more than a little biased, but just in terms of how it reads I like how well it expresses your views. Again, it is a story, not very poetic, but just on the basis of how this reads. My only problem with it is the "if Jack Parson's was the anti-christ" line, it seems choppy. Thanks for the, whatever else it may be, interesting rea


    • horus8 gold member
      July 31, 2007
      Edit | Reply
      I don't think calling yourself bias because of the alien aspect is really prudent. I believe calling yourself uninformed because you haven't read Jack Parson's biography, or anything he's ever written would be more spot on.

  • Maingie Luupi-n-ine
    June 28, 2007

    Edit | Reply

    Laugh ease the Lore: Laugh until Will

  • Nicole Hanna
    June 12, 2007

    Edit | Reply
    Opening this with astrology was the kicker for me. You just can't grab my attention any better than if you were performing this piece right in front of me, with such intense imagery as that. And, I'll say that you are one of the few poets around here who could write something this lengthy and keep me captivated until the very end. Jack Parson as the anti-christ was just stellar. Seriously. I'd love to hire you as my muse for a while. lol Loved this. No point in saying more than that.


  • six of diamonds
    June 11, 2007

    Edit | Reply
    A bit circular and you repeat sections. There is a voice here, but I don't think in either building an argument or presenting yourself as the teacher with new information that will change the reader. Yes, this is prose, but I think that's fine, though you might move it to storywrite instead of allpoetry with better results.

    I don't think the underwear picture helps your writing.

    You also have some spelling errors.

    You could rework this entire thing and make it shorter and delete the sections that are too similar and make it work much better.

    I didn't need any links, I have read conspiracy theory and have heard much of this before...but if your commentary was meant to convince anyone of something in particular it only succeeds in making them question your mental stability.



    • horus8 gold member
      June 11, 2007
      Edit | Reply
      I understand that you're a bit slow, so I'm going to alphabetize it for you.

      A. That's not me in the picture (But obviously why you didn't like the picture is why I do).

      B. Jack Parsons is hardly a conspiracy theory. I'd suggest reading his autobiography before chewing on your own penis in front of me, and my readers.

      C. The merging of fiction and non-fiction always comes across as being "unstable mentally" but that's the point
      isn't it (mary shelly's frankenstein is largely based on
      a real event that took place at lord byron's) unless you're fucking dear abbey, are you dear abbey?

      D. I'm currently working on a screenplay, now, when I research my 'work' this is how I like to do it, by spewing out tons of nonsense, and then taking what I consider to be diamonds out to be used in a final edit.
      You've just critiqued a load of research, thanks, but I'm well aware of what it is.

      E. I'd like to thank you for your time, but there is no amount of money that one could bet me to convince me of the fact that going into this read you had even heard of Jack Parsons. Seeing conspiracy theories on the Simpsons is by no means what I would call familiarizing yourself with conspiracies. Here are three words for you that you've never heard of, and if you have? it was only on a surface level. Autodidact, Libertarian, Cad. You are the latter, I am the two prior.

      Now run a long and go help those that don't make more money a year writing than you. Because I sir, am a damn dandy.


  • Mrs Mulholland
    May 30, 2007

    Edit | Reply
    I hope you will not be offended when I say I found this over-long, rambling and almost incoherent in parts. I have to confess I was unable to finish it either. It's also prose not poetry.

  • luvdrkchocolate
    March 18, 2007

    Edit | Reply
    Wow. This takes a long time to read through! I even went to the links and read all of those. It did help me understand where you were coming from on the people you mentioned and the situations too. It seems very strange to me and like something out of a science fiction book. I guess I just live life too simply. Where you are everywhere at once. I'm not sure what to think to tell you the truth of it. And it's hard to tell because everyone is taking everyone else's word for it and what they've written down but there's no way to prove it really. I don't know what to say because even if I knew for sure that it was truth, there's not a lot I can do. I help people where I can and try to bring happiness and smiles. Life is short and these are the best things in life. I can't do much about anything anyway. But this was very informative and you did a good job of putting this together.


  • Love of a Bullet
    February 25, 2007

    Edit | Reply
    But what about the black matrix? What about the bird flu pandemic? What about the secret purpose of the Iraq war? Better be a lot in the next edition.

    ~Das


  • Houdini
    February 24, 2007
    Edit | Reply
    She claimed we were lovers and brother and sister, husband,
    and wife in past lives.

    This line really stood out to me. Interesting that you add links in this piece. Is this a commentary or a poetic piece? Either way a lot to think about!
    Good luck in the contest!

1 - 18 of 18