Read Contests Groups Learn Forums Store Help
 

Celebrating Idiotic Alaskan Sarah The Moose-Muncher

Here in Britain we are laughing until we defecate bigtime at the concept
of a moronic eskimo moose-muncher with an IQ of 30 being a potential
US vice-presidential candidate, especially since her knowledge of history
and international politics could be written on a sheet of toilet paper
with lots of space left over for the usual stains. We especially love the idea
that a pensioner "war hero" (hahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!) who stands a
25% chance of kicking the bucket in the next 4 years would pick
a provincial madwoman who denies scientific fact and whose main slogan seems
to be "Alaska for Jesus and let's bomb Russia for a laugh!" as his deputy,
and who seems to have all the charm of a demented lipsticked piranha
and who believes in zombies, witches and other ghouly-woolies more suited
to kiddies aged 5-10. John's clearly off his pathetic trolley, poor old fart,
it makes you weep. And he can't even buy a suit which fits over his fat gut
without straining at the buttons, either.

I would love to see a funny poem about this.



Contest is Over

  • Contest was judged on October 15, 2008
  • Rewards: Gold: 300
  • Final notes:
    Only seven entries? Well that's over a tenth of the average Republican voter's IQ so I suppose I should be pleased.

Contest Winners

  1. Let me be quite blunt:
    Old John McCain's a cunt;
    by Engelbert Humpalot 22 lines, 14 comments, on Oct 13 11:32 AM 2008. In Politics, Humour
    Gold trophy winner
    • Commented on by judge. [remove]
  2. by chills 32 lines, 15 comments, on Oct 2 3:23 PM 2008. In Abuse, Adult, Angst, Society, Humor, Election madness
    Silver trophy winner
    • Viewed by judge. [remove]
  3. Well let me tell you straight ‘cause I’m that kinda gal.
    I’m a maverick you see but I can be a pal.
    by KayJay 46 lines, 11 comments, on Oct 6 7:27 PM 2008. In Contemporary, Society, Sarah Palin, Politics
    Bronze trophy winner
    • Commented on by judge. [remove]

Entries [7]

1 - 7 of 7

Add a comment

    : Comment:

Comments

1 - 27 of 27

  • Malabu
    September 13, 2008
    Edit | Reply
    how about doing a contest on ...NoBama?


  • DogFish silver member
    September 13, 2008
    Edit | Reply
    This isn't an entry...but it offers one Canadian's perspective on the subject!http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20080906.SOUTHEY06/TPStory/?query=tsouthey%40globeandmail.comhttp://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20080906.SOUTHEY06/TPStory/?query=tsouthey%40globeandmail.com


    • Freed by Mercy silver member
      September 13, 2008
      Edit | Reply
      Thanks for this article. I'm embarrassed and ashamed by McCain's nomination of Sarah Palin. What an idiotic choice! This choice shows what kind of leader he'll be.

      I'm a woman. She is SCARY. Gloria Steinam wrote a great article about How SP is the wrong woman.

      Please win, Obama.

  • whatami
    September 13, 2008
    Edit | Reply

    I take offense

    I've lived in Alaska for eight years, and I think Palin has done a lot for our state since she's been governor.

    I understand your political fascination over this, but I don't understand why you would call them names. Especially "moronic eskimo moose-muncher," to me, it seems to border on racial hate, whether this was your intent or not.

    thanks.

    • Edna Sweetlove
      September 14, 2008
      Edit | Reply
      Being the governor of an unimportant provincial state and/or the mayor of a little hick town is one thing. Being a heartbeat away from holding the world's most powerful job is another. I totally fail to see how calling a foolish woman who boasts of eating moose hamburgers an eskimo moose-muncher has anything to do with either race, hate or racial hate.

      • ecrivain01
        October 12, 2008
        Edit | Reply

        Republicans revel ...

        in racism and hatred, but only if they are the propagating it. They can dish it out all day, but God help anybody who disputes their insanities.


  • the.art.of.drowning
    September 13, 2008
    Edit | Reply
    haha. i completely agree. in australia it's a hilarious subject too. i'd love to enter but i can't write political.


  • SilverWolf
    September 13, 2008
    Edit | Reply


  • SilverWolf
    September 13, 2008
    Edit | Reply
    I CANT BELEIVE THIS!


  • paulcreates silver member
    September 13, 2008
    Edit | Reply
    You are clearly off your pathetic trolley, you poor old fart.


  • Bosiarbooger gold member
    September 13, 2008
    Edit | Reply

    My dearest Edna

    I'm pretty sure you would not be laughing quite so hard if your ticket included the choices mine does. I am not sure there is even a good sixth choice. Goofy and Mickey have withdrawn since Sarah can hunt. Forgetting the VP usually shoots his hunting partner not the hunted.

  • Bosiarbooger gold member
    September 13, 2008
    Edit | Reply

    My dearest Edna

    I am not so sure you would be laughing so hard if your choice left you choking on your spit. Like Malabu said "NoBama" or the Dynamic Duo. Give me a few days to stop crying and I'll be back to write. Your humble servent, Boog. PS Irene Welsh has been difficult to find on line, I am going to have to resort to heading into Detroit to find her, though things will be a bit safer now that Kwami in almost gone.


    • Edna Sweetlove
      September 14, 2008
      Edit | Reply

      My dearest Booger

      I don't know who Irene Walsh is and who is Kwami in ?


  • Peripatetic gold member
    September 14, 2008
    Edit | Reply
    Setting aside the arrogant narrow-mindedness, hateful comments regarding age, and the racial slur of your diatribe against two people with whom you may disagree (Do you even know the issues or the arguments for their points of view?), could you not at least spell 'celebrating' correctly?
    When you are reduced to ad hominem attacks rather than reasoned, serious discussion of issues in the public forum, you persuade no one to your side of the issues, but you do expose the poverty of your intellect.
    I am a libertarian with serious concerns about the political positions of the candidates of both major parties in our upcoming elections. However, as distorting of each other's backgrounds and messages as some of their statements are, none of them approaches the level of ignorance or malevolence of your vitriolic spewing.
    You should be ashamed of yourself, but I suspect you lost all sense of propriety or responsibility for your captious incontinence some time ago.

    • Edna Sweetlove
      September 14, 2008
      Edit | Reply
      I loved your comment. It really has to be the most pompous and long-winded thing I have read for a long time. You must have spent hours looking up some lovely obscure words. I am amused about your calling yourself a "libertarian" as this is a term I have hitherto not encountered. I assume this involves the right to be personally rude to anyone who disagrees with you.

      Since you are clearly a pedant (and I approve of that) I am surprised you feel the fact that a man of 72 has a 1 in 4 chance of dying by the time he is 76 is somehow a slur about age. It is a fact. And surely the fact that someone who seriously aspires to be the most powerful person in the world at the age of 72 should surely select an intelligent running mate, knowing he has a good chance of not living to complete his term of office. Instead he has picked an uneducated ignorant woman who denies science in favour of creationism, who apparently is happy to start a war with Russia and who is so stupid as to imagine that her country is winning its war in Iraq; and who also apparently believes that Iraq deserved to be attacked as it was somehow involved in the 9/11 incident. Such people need to be laughed at, not taken seriously.

      I thank you for pointing out my typing error re "celebrating" and I have now put that right.


      • Exit-Stage-Right
        September 30, 2008
        Edit | Reply
        re: "Instead he has picked an uneducated ignorant woman who denies science in favour of creationism,"

        Yes, you're referring to the science which claims that either the birth of all matter was essentially a sudden fluctuation in the nothingness, OR, due to the nature of the curvature of time and space no birthing was required since the end of time, space and matter is just a point on an invisible ring juxtapose the beginning of time, space and matter. I'd say your scientists had better sharpen their pencils a little better than that.

        Let's talk about Al Gore's science. Lord knows, he must be a REAL scientist because they gave him the Flying Fickle Finger of Fate... or was it a Nobel Prize... I forget. But anyway, Mr. Al "The Arctic is Melting" Gore, weather wizard par excellence, should know that, instead of the Arctic ice pack completely disappearing by the end of the melt season (Sept. 21/22) as his toady minions predicted, the damned thing actually grew by 9%. I hate it when that happens.

        Yeah, global warming was a hot topic (pardon the pun) until it had to be changed to "man-made global climate change" as the "warming" aspect of the phrase became too untenable.

        So all in all, I like Sarah's big nebulous guy with white robes, phosphorescent eyes and lightning bolts in each hand breathing the universe into existence... it's sounds a lot more plausible than your hokey "science".

        • Edna Sweetlove
          October 2, 2008
          Edit | Reply
          Re: "I like Sarah's big nebulous guy with white robes, phosphorescent eyes and lightning bolts in each hand breathing the universe into existence... it's sounds a lot more plausible than your hokey "science"."

          Oh dear. Another one who believes in a stupid god creature. The fact that anyone could deny science in favour of deluded religious fantasy is sad. My sympathy to you. But you should try waking up. Science is fact. Evolution is fact. This planet is countless millions of years old. Adam and Eve and all that stuff are just fairt stories for dumbos.

          • Exit-Stage-Right
            October 3, 2008
            Edit | Reply

            Hey Ed,

            When you assert "Science is fact" I couldn't agree more. Unfortunately the best of the best cosmologists can only ~guess~ as to what the origins of the universe may have been. Their guesses are conveniently organized in virtual containers call "theories". Theories aren't science. At best, they are "potential science" in the making. Until you can quantitatively verify the physical attributes of a system and understand and accurately predict it's nature... you don't have science... you've got theories.

            A lot of people such as myself who appreciate the finer aspects of the Christian religion believe that the universe ~is~ billions of years old and that Adam and Eve may well have been allegory that the spirit of God used to relate the beginning of civilization to Moses in terms he could understand. In 1500 BC, only the most rudimentary mathematical relationships had been discovered and only a relatively few people could use them. God couldn't exactly tell Moses the Universe was 5 Billion years old as the concept of the number "zero" hadn't been firmly established. My point: the Bible doesn't purport to be a science book, but fair minded creationists can see harmony between "Intelligent Design" and the tenets of modern science.

            • Edna Sweetlove
              October 5, 2008
              Edit | Reply
              Sadly, the concept of "God" is man-made. Unless you reject the bible as being a load of worthless boring fictional old cock, you have a bit of problem. You must move one step back and accept that "God" as a concept is a load of old crap, that Moses was just a figment of the imagination, and basically that Christianity is a bucket of useless old stale horse turd only believed in by atavistic throwback mongols. But I suppose you can't manage that intellectual jump, dearie.


  • Ogreatbaldone gold member
    September 14, 2008
    Edit | Reply
    Edna, you always are on the cusp of current events arent you? this is sure to bring some very interesting entries, I will be back to read them...peace

  • ea silver member
    September 14, 2008
    Edit | Reply
    I just like the idea of a moose-muncher in the Whitehouse - it harkens back to the days of Teddy Roosevelt, when men were mean and women were meese.

  • ecrivain01
    September 14, 2008
    Edit | Reply

    John McShame and Sarah Fail 'Em ...

    are both insane, so they go well together. They also point up the fact that insanity is not uncommon among white Americans. (Of whom I am one, but fortunately I have a brain.)

    I'm too ill just now to write, but I hope you get some great entries here. I'll certainly be back to read some of them.


  • Fug-azi
    September 17, 2008
    Edit | Reply
    Well Edna I'd love to have a go at this contest but I'm afraid American (pre-paid) presidential races just bore me as the majority of people in them are just playing to the crowds, its only when they are in office that they become interesting ie; Kennedy, Clinton etc .. and lets be honest the president is little more than a figurehead with all the important decisions being made by others. Whether this lady becomes DP or not won't make that much difference.

  • Philogos gold member
    September 19, 2008
    Edit | Reply

    Too late for the contest (as usual)

    http://allpoetry.com/poem/4610759


  • Rowan Oak
    September 25, 2008
    Edit | Reply
    Ha! I live here in the U.S. and I must say that we're probably in trouble. People seem to love to vote for the most ridiculously insane and ignorant candidates. Whoever is for the war that never should have been started, and whoever vomits up statements about how religious they are will probably win because there are people that fall for that sort of thing.

1 - 27 of 27