Ditch the ads, upload images and much more - upgrade today from 5.95/month!
Read Contests Groups Learn Forums Store Help
 

Need NON-BELIEVERS/AGNOSTICS ONLY!!!Help Me with my apologetics ministries with this 3 Part Challen

Need NON-BELIEVERS/AGNOSTICS ONLY!!!Help Me with my apologetics ministries with this 3 Part Challenge/Survey: FIRST, You must read: Psalm 22:1-18 (Old Testament) and Matthew 27:45-47 (New Testament), and explain what you see that handshakes the two texts. SECONDLY:Answer in multiple choice why you don’t believe in the God of the Bible/Christ His Son 1.) It’s too unreal, and I don’t get the Bible stuff. 2.) I’ve had a negative experience with believers on certain issues 3.) I’m self-sufficient in my own beliefs. Christianity is a free float to la-la land. 4.) I don’t know for sure, but I just don’t like the idea anyway. LASTLY: In 100 words or less, give me a brief explanation underlying the reason you selected. I want clear intelligent examples onwhat your reasons are in resisting belief in God/ Christ. PLEASE! No plotted arrogance ,bashing other religions, or senseless profanity. This is for thesis and not for pointing fingers or judging!! Thank you so much,

Contest is Over

  • Contest was judged on February 4, 2003
  • Rewards: Gold: 100
  • Final notes:

Entries [2]

  • Umnnn...okay...but I'm cheating...'cause I had a couple of bibles...but can't find them right now...Please though give me an opportunity...your challenge was a
    by neurosine 88 lines, 3 comments, on Jan 28 2:49 AM 2003
    • Commented on by judge.
  • Ok as i see it the two texts are basically saying the same thing, it's about time God showed himself as Jesus was in need and felt somewhat foresaken ie 'My God
    by Barb Davidson 6 lines, 12 comments, on Jan 28 1:11 PM 2003
    • Commented on by judge.

Add a comment

    : Comment:

Comments


  • CookieZeal Greeters member
    February 2, 2003
    Edit | Reply
    This wasn't a very easy nor popular theme for a challenge, but I appreciate the time all of you gave. I judged this on objectivity and Carmelah gave a very tight and eloquent briefing and Barb Davidson gave a very good contesting as well. Both, however, took time to read the two texts that were threads to what followed. On that note, and in that order of listing, I will give the reserved amount of points to the winner, but also some to the runner-up. Thank you all again.