Read Contests Groups Learn Forums Store Help
 

An argument in pro of bringing back the Monarchy, or creating a Formalized One, for the United States of America

Some of us … were arguing, in the Pub in the Adult Forum at the website Allpoetry.com/ starting with some one’s criticism of Hillary Clinton, I guess on the near and recent occasion of her winning the New Hampshire primary or caucus, I forget which one it is. And I called that person… a right winger, not really meaning to insult, but saying that their comment about stocking up on guns and ammo was their way of thinking. Which led my thinking to an admission of what are my politics, truly as I see them today.

Some of us adult or "wanna be" adults (I might humbly include myself in this latter at times) were arguing, in the Pub in the Adult Forum, starting with some one’s criticism of Hillary Clinton. And I called that person or persons, a right winger, not really meaning to insult, but saying that their comment about stocking up on guns and ammo was their way of thinking.

Some one took umbrage at that. So I apologized, specially since I had had my morning “main bowel movement after my first cup of coffee in the morning.” Yeah, I was FULL of shit.

Then I started this esssay. You know the old Latin word from which apology derives is apologia which is a style of essay, or rhetoric. Please do correct me if I am wrong. And thanks:

These days we have more of the same, during the Primary stage of the Electoral politics and campaigning. Liberals vs. Republicans, with everyone else kind of scattered in the middle. Or not. Case in point, the Fascists. Ooooh scary word, that. Anyway…

I’m a monarchist. I’m for having a royalty, with the attendante nobility and all the trappings of feudal society. Why not? We already have one de facto. Might as well recognize it as the reality.

Think I’m joking? Maybe I am. But then again, some of us are descended from nobility and royalty, and that is a geneological fact.

Maybe I have nothing to lose, having sunk to almost the bottom of the barrel(see note 1), truth to tell. YEs, this year 2008 no more lying for me. Was I full of shit? Hell yah; & I just had my late Saturday morning bowel movement, and it was good, and praise the Angels and Saints.

1. I was homless so to speak although in truth we are all of us homeless, just biding our time while we wait for our entry to our real home with our Heavenly Father

Add a comment

    : Comment:

Comments


  • dericlee
    January 13, 2008
    Edit | Reply
    Monarchy is hereditary authority. Hereditary authority inevitably becomes inbred out of a restriction to marry "according to their station." It's undeniable...just look at Prince Charlie's ears...not to mention his comments about wishing to be "Camilla's tampon."


    I see these qualities as undesirable in government.


  • Edna Sweetlove
    January 12, 2008
    Edit | Reply
    The USA has a dreadful constitution. Whilst the English Constitution has many faults, the concept of a hereditary but powerless monarchy has much to recommend it. Maybe not the English model, more the Norwegian or Dutch one, where the monarch is just a normal person, but someone who represents the state.

    But until you drop the triple requirements that a US president must be staggeringly rich, must have huge corporate backing and must have nice white teeth, you're up shit creek sans paddle.

    PS. I'll ignore the final comment about heavenly daddies which seems to indicate you have severe problems in mixing up your bowels with your brains.