Read Contests Groups Learn Forums Store Help
 

Some Alternatives to Rhyme

This is an involved discussion about alternatives to rhyme complete with elaborate examples and explanation.

 


Overview

 

Rhyme is just one scheme of phonological parallelism out of many. Maybe I should expand upon this some for clarity. Phonological parallelism, in this sense, is when similar word sounds occur within or between lines of poetry. Rhyme is a form of this parallelism. For instance, take any rhyming lines of poetry:

 

Where'er you find "the cooling western breeze",
In the next line, it "whispers through the trees":
          —From An Essay on Criticism by Alexander Pope

 

The rhyme between "breeze" and "trees" here is a phonological parallelism between these two lines. Such parallelisms can occur within a line or between multiple lines, or even between stanzas or entire texts. What most people are familiar with, however, is the parallelism of rhyme between specific lines within a given stanza. In the example above, we refer to this parallelism as end-line rhyme, because the phonological parallelism is occurring between line endings.

 

Rhyme is just one such form of parallelism available from an array of phonological parallelisms. In this article, I explore with you some of the alternatives to rhyme that are available to you as a poet. Our primary focus is the monosyllabic (single syllable) phonological parallelisms, but we look at some disyllabic (two syllable) phonological parallelisms as well. What I hope you will do is take this information and allow it to influence your creative process when writing poetry. You should be able to devise and make use of, if you like, polysyllabic (three or more syllables) phonological parallelisms on your own once you have ingested the gist of this article by combing the various schemes discussed below.

 

Seven basic monosyllabic schemes

 

Including rhyme, there are seven basic monosyllabic phonological parallelisms at your immediate disposal. These are alliteration, assonance, consonance, reverse rhyme, frame rhyme, rhyme, and rich rhyme. Some of these terms will be instantly familiar to you, "alliteration" for instance. Let’s take one of the two lines quoted from Pope’s poem above and modify it slightly using end-line alliteration instead end-line rhyme.

 

Where'er you find "the cooling western breeze",
In the next it rarely frazzles golden braids.

 

As you can see, the effect of end-line alliteration is different from the effect of end-line rhyme, yet it still has a potency not unlike the potency of rhyme. And, you have an entirely new pool of words to draw from just in using end-line alliteration. Imagine the pool of words you have to draw from between all seven of these schemes.

 

In The Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics, the article on "Rhyme" sets forth a schema by which the seven phonological schemes introduced above may be recognized and understood. On the accented syllable of a given word, there will often be an opening consonant sound, a medial vowel sound, and a closing consonant sound. This is schematized as C V C, where the first C is the opening consonant sound, V is the medial vowel sound, and the last C is the closing consonant sound. The individual sounds within a word represented by this C V C schema are called phonemes or phonemic clusters, which is how I often refer to them below.

 

The following table allows us to identify these schemes using the C V C schema. The C V C part or parts that relate to a given scheme will be underlined and bolded, followed by the name of that scheme and three or more illustrative words:

 

1) C V C – alliteration – "bat", "boy", "barge", "binge"
2) C V C – assonance – "
bat", "cab", "fad", "man"
3) C V Cconsonance – "
bat", "grit", "spite", "fort"
4) C V C – reverse rhyme – "
bat", "bag", "ban", "back"
5) C V Cframe rhyme – "
bat", "bait", "bite", "boat"
6) C V Crhyme – "
bat", "cat", "rat", "flat"
7) C V Crich rhyme – "
vein", "vain", "vane"

 

All too often, information like this will be presented without actually exemplifying it further. I think it can be nice to see schemes such as these actually exemplified as they could be used in lines of poetry because this can help the information to sink in.

 

Exemplifying the seven basic schemes

 

The following examples illustrate these schemes one at a time. Each scheme is demonstrated within and between the example lines. So, phonological parallelisms occur within and between lines, at the very least. Understand that my examples are created to suit the purpose, invented off the top of my head and modified to make the best use of a given scheme. I have constructed the examples so that they can be followed and understood syntactically. Though they are intended specifically to illustrate the use of the schemes, I have attempted to make them as interesting and engaging as I can in a way that will hopefully demonstrate each scheme’s ability to convey meaning, invoke response, and affect the reader.

 

In the examples below the phoneme or phonemic cluster that relates to a given scheme is underlined.

 

Alliteration: C V C

 

I pared my heart with poisoned bloody sheers
Expressing raw the price of all my shame

 

Here there are three sets of alliteration, "pared"/"poisoned" in the first line, "expressing"/"price" in the second line, and "sheers"/"shame" between the final syllables.

 

Note that, despite the different syllabic lengths of some of the words, the alliteration occurs between accented syllables. Alliteration can occur between accented and unaccented syllables, or between unaccented syllables, but this normally will greatly diminish the effect.

 

Such is the case for all of these schemes. These schemes are used primarily between accented syllables. Using them with unaccented syllables can create interesting effects, but it is a good idea to first practice and play around with each of these schemes between accented syllables only in order to gain some understanding of their effects and proficiency with their use.

 

Assonance: C V C

 

Silent stars pierce steady darkness through to morn
Bright
the sunrise sends a wonder now restored

 

Here there are four sets of assonance, "stars"/"darkness" in the first line, "silent"/"bright" between the first syllables, "steady"/"sends" between the fifth syllables, and "morn"/"restored" between the final syllables.

 

Note that I underlined the "r" phoneme between "stars"/"darkness" and "morn"/"restored" as part of the assonance. Although grammatically "r" is considered a consonant, phonologically it can act just like a vowel. Compare "dark"/"stars" to "dark"/"stab" or "dark"/"snob". The latter two sets just don’t assonate. The effect of the assonant sound similarity is lost between the words when the "r" phoneme is omitted. When you have a diphthong (‘diff thong), which is a combination of two or more vowel sounds, assonance is achieved by repeating the entire diphthong, as in "corn"/"bored". If only part of the diphthong is repeated, as in "corn"/"lode", this is what would be called partial assonance. Each of these schemes has a partial state, where only part of a particular phonemic cluster is repeated. I get into these partial schemes with detail later.

 

Consonance: C V C

 

We swim through the moments of countless years
And crash on the threshold of wanton cares

 

Here there are four sets of consonance, "swim"/"moments" in the first line, "crash"/"threshold" in the second line, "countless"/"wanton" between the eighth syllables, and "years"/"cares" between the final syllables.

 

Note that here I underline the "r" phoneme between "years"/"cares" as part of the consonance. The "r" phoneme is capable of fulfilling the role of a vowel or a consonant, depending on how and where it is used, especially where it modifies a consonant or consonant cluster. For instance, compare the "s" phoneme between "cares"/"face". The "s" phoneme is less pronounced in "cares", more pronounced in "face". Many vowel sounds are capable of affecting the way consonants sound; likewise, many consonants are just as capable of affecting the way vowels sound. It is up to you as a poet to decide where phonological parallels sound agreeable and where they don’t, when they suit your purposes and when they don’t. I would say that the words "cares"/"face" are consonant, but I may or may not use a pair such as this depending on whether or not I felt that the inclusion of the "r" phoneme in consonance with "cares" would better suit my purposes.

 

Reverse Rhyme: C V C

 

Such storms can bring you to the brink of all you fear
Restore
what faith you can in faded hopes and feel

 

Here there are four sets of reverse rhyme, "bring"/"brink" in the first line, "faith"/"faded" in the second line, "storms"/"restore" between the second syllables, and "fear"/"feel" between the final syllables.

 

Frame Rhyme: C V C

 

Each sturdy steed-like soldier ranked the field
With fearsome faces seldom seen defiled

 

Here there are four sets of frame rhyme, "sturdy"/"steed" in the first line, "fearsome"/"faces" in the second line, "soldiers"/"seldom" between the sixth syllables, and "field"/"defiled" between the final syllables.

 

Rhyme: C V C

 

Though rhyme was spurned by those who burned for the simple
The time shall rise when most despise such a whimper

 

Here there are four sets of rhyme, "spurned"/"burned" in the first line, "rise"/"despise" in the second line, "rhyme"/"time" between the second syllables, and "simple"/"whimper" between the final syllables.

 

Note that I have rhymed two words here that many would not consider rhymes, "simple" and "whimper". These words do in fact rhyme. I touched on this above, but I want to make it especially clear here given the broad misconceptions of just what it is that makes a rhyme. There need only be phonological parallelism of assonance and consonance between accented syllables for rhyme to occur. If the following unaccented syllable does not share this concordance, this does not mean the word doesn’t rhyme, it just means that the rhyme is monosyllabic rather than disyllabic. For instance, pairs like "hunting"/"punter", "fainter"/"plaintive", and "silencer"/"piloting" are all monosyllabic rhymes. If the phonological parallelism carries over into the next syllable, for instance "canter"/"banter" and "filing"/"styling", then you have disyllabic rhyme. If the parallelism carries over into three or more syllables, then the rhyme becomes polysyllabic.

 

Rich Rhyme: C V C

 

What does it avail you to prevail in every affair
When nothing you’ve gained can be regained as spiritual fare

 

Here there are three sets of rich rhyme, "avail"/"prevail" in the first line, "gained"/"regained" in the second line, and "affair"/"fare" between the final syllables.

 

As you can see, rich rhyme can occur between parts of words, as with "affair" and "fare". It is not necessarily restricted to correlations between whole words, which is of course the same thing as paronomasia.

 

Of course, these schemes can be mixed and matched at will:

 

fight the fear and hold your gold with grip
k
eep
your cool and never ever gripe

 

Here we have two sets of alliteration with "fight"/"fear" in the first line and "keep"/"cool" in the second line, two sets of rhyme with "hold"/"gold" in the first line and "never"/"ever" (disyllabic) in the second line, and one frame rhyme with "grip"/"gripe" between the final syllables.

 

Partial schemes

 

As I touched on above, these schemes can sometimes be effective even when the phonological parallelisms aren’t precise. Whenever the phonemes of a scheme are only partially concordant, this can be considered a partial scheme. For instance, as I pointed out before, the assonant words "corn" and "lode" represent a partial assonance through the "o" phoneme. Full assonance here would be achieved by including the "r" phoneme in the second word to make it "corn" and "lord".

 

For each scheme, the combinations of partial phonological parallelism are nearly endless, but I think it is worth demonstrating just a couple of combinations from each of the schemes, except rich rhyme. If an occurrence of rich rhyme is partial, then you actually have one of the other six schemes by default. In the examples, the phonemic clusters that relate to a given scheme are underlined while the specific phonemes or phonemic clusters that actually correlate are bolded.

 

Partial alliteration:

 

Stars are shining like silent shrines of light
Dreadful
doubts will fade like floating clouds

 

Here there are four sets of partial alliteration, "stars"/"silent" in the first line with the "s" phoneme, "fade"/"floating" and "floating"/"clouds" in the second line with the "f" and "l" phonemes, respectively, and "light"/"clouds" between the final syllables with the "l" phoneme again. So, the "l" phoneme here creates a partial alliteration between three words in all, "light"/"floating"/"clouds".

 

As you can see, the effect can still be quite striking despite the lack of exact alliterative parallelism.

 

Partial assonance:

 

This noise is a grave reminder of our grievous plight
The cries are enjoined with hazy din that drains us all

 

Here there are several combinations of partial assonance. Partial assonance is extremely prevalent in natural speech because there are only so many vowel sounds—hence vowel combinations—available. Some of the partial assonance here is likely to stand out very clearly to you, for instance the "r" phoneme between "grievous"/""drives".

 

There is no need to point out all the combinations that I see myself between these two lines, but I’ll point out two sets that may not be so obvious. The first set is "noise"/"reminder" (no eez)/(re ma een der) in the first line, where the brief "ee" phoneme provides the partial assonance. The second set is with the "ah" phoneme in "plight"/"all" (plah eet)/(all) between the final syllables.

 

As is the way with such things, now that you have seen partial assonance further demonstrated and described, it is possible that you’ll suddenly become aware of partial assonance everywhere.

 

Partial consonance:

 

Marble monsters stand like ghostly hosts
Beauty hard and cold in lifelike craft

 

Here there are five sets of partial consonance, "monsters"/"stand" and "ghostly"/"hosts" in the first line with the "n" phoneme and the "st" phonemic cluster, respectively, "hard"/"cold" and "lifelike"/"craft" in the second line with the "d" and "f" phonemes, respectively, and "hosts"/"craft" between the final syllables with the "t" phoneme.

 

Partial reverse rhyme:

 

Striking words are tightened on the page
Phrases
arc and fade from time and space

 

Here there are three sets partial reverse rhyme, "striking"/"tightened" in the first line with the "t" phoneme, "phrases"/"fade" in the second line with the "f" phoneme, and "page"/"space" between the final syllables with the "p" phoneme.

 

Partial frame rhyme:

 

If you can trust that angels guide your life
Then you can treat your petty gold as fluff

 

Here there are three sets of partial frame rhyme, "trust"/"treat" between the fourth syllables with the "t" phonemes, "guide"/"gold" between the eighth syllables with the "g" and "d" phonemes, and "life"/"fluff" between the final syllables with the "l" and "f" phonemes.

 

Partial rhyme:

 

My soul is damp and cold within the mist
My thoughts are trapped in cotton far from bliss

 

Here there are four sets of partial rhyme, "soul"/"cold" in the first line with the "l" phoneme, "thoughts"/"cotton" in the second line with the "t" phoneme, "damp"/"trapped" between the fourth syllables with the "p" phoneme, and "mist"/"bliss" between the final syllables with the "s" phoneme.

 

Note that if you had partial assonance as opposed to partial consonance or alliteration in any of the last three schemes explored, this would change the scheme entirely. Partial alliteration allows for partial reverse rhyme; partial consonance allows for partial rhyme; and either or both allow for partial frame rhyme. For instance, if you were to take the partial rhyme between "soul" and "cold" and change "cold" to "coil", making it partial assonance only, you end up with pure consonance instead. If you instead change "cold" to "coiled", then you end up with partial consonance instead of partial rhyme. This is part of the reason we can’t have a partial rich rhyme, because if you change anything, like the rich rhyme "vane"/"vain" to "vane"/"veins" or "vane"/"van", this ends up being pure reverse rhyme or pure frame rhyme, respectively. Rich rhyme is always in full concordance with C V C.

 

Disyllabic examples

 

All of these schemes can be extended beyond a single syllable, as I’ve alluded to above. The C V C schema can be made disyllabic by adding a lowercased v c to represent the unaccented second syllables that don’t begin with their own consonants and a lowercased c v c to represent the unaccented second syllables that do begin with their own consonants. Compare "paddock" (C V C v c) to "padlock" (C V C c v c).

 

This table shows some disyllabic renditions of the seven basic schemes:

 

1) disyllabic alliteration
    C V C c v c – "
priceless", "piglet", "padlock", "poplar"

 

2) disyllabic assonance
    C V
C v c – "
flustered", "bugger", "lovers", "mother"
    C V C c v c – "
manhole", "lactose", "tax code", "backbone"

 

3) disyllabic consonance
    C V C
v c –"
acorn", "toucan", "deacon", "liken"
    C V C
c v c –"
mandate", "turncoat", "sunlight", "rainsuit"

 

4) disyllabic reverse rhyme
    C
V C v c – "
batter", "battered", "batters", "battery"
    C
V C c v c – "
brainless", "bracelet", "brakeless"

 

5) disyllabic frame rhyme
    C
V C v c – "
photon", "fatten", "futon", "frighten"
    C
V C c v c – "
mansion", "mention", "moonshine"

 

6) disyllabic rhyme
    C V
C v c – "
maddest", "saddest", "gladdest"
    C V C c v c – "
pension", "Kenyan", "tendon"

 

7) disyllabic rich rhyme
    C
V C v c – "
siting", "sighting", "citing"
    C
V C c v c – "
headman", "head-man", "head man"

 

As you can see from this table, disyllabic alliteration with the C V C v c schema would be equivalent to monosyllabic frame rhyme, so there was no point in providing an example of this since frame rhyme is exemplified above both in the C V C table and in an illustrative couplet.

 

The C V C schema is itself just a guideline to help mentally process and understand the phonemic correlations between words. Many words don’t fall strictly under the C V C schema or its disyllabic extensions listed above, yet the schema can still be used to talk about those words. For instance, "at" and "bat" still rhyme under C V C, since the first C, not being underlined in bold, can be considered optional to the word in order to fulfill the parallelism. Same goes for any of the phonological schemes that have been covered or that you may devise for yourself using these elements.

 

What’s neat about having the schema charted out in this fashion is that you can suddenly see how different schemes can be blended together for different effects. For instance, you can blend primary (on the accented syllable) alliteration with secondary (on the unaccented syllable) rhyme:

 

C V C v c – "fasting", "finding", "forcing", "fishing"

 

Or maybe you would like to blend primary consonance with secondary assonance:

 

C V C v c – "random", "tendon", "founded", "attendant"

 

The possibilities are endless.

 

Applying alternative schemes

 

Any of these schemes can be used in place of or in conjunction with an end-line rhyme scheme. For instance, say you come across the rhyme scheme abba; you can assign the a to end-line consonance and the b to end-line alliteration. Or, if you like, you can assign the a to end-line rhyme and the b to end-line disyllabic frame rhyme. Wherever you come across a rhyme scheme for a given form, you can enrich and broaden your exploration of that form by using the various schemes introduced in this article in place of or in conjunction with the rhyme scheme.

 

As I said when I started this article, rhyme is just one scheme of phonological parallelism out of many. Just one. As you explore the alternative schemes presented here, the small subset of words that rhyme is suddenly opened up to many other subsets of words that can be used with other schemes.

 

In wrapping up this article, I would like for you to reflect for just a moment on one more thing. Did you see the term "slant rhyme" even once up to this point? No, you haven’t. There is a good reason for this. What is commonly called slant rhyme is in actuality either partial rhyme, consonance, or partial consonance. "Slant rhyme" and its brother, "near rhyme", are not terms that really mean anything.

Included in the list

Add a comment

    : Comment:

Comments

1 - 27 of 27
  • Normpo
    February 5, 2006
    Edit | Reply

    EXCELLENT

    No joking --- I have over 40 books an the craft of writing/readin poetry --- some of them classics --- but none has such a thorough examination of rhyme and application as you have done here. May I reference it on my own website? It's a great teaching tool.
    You really help clear up the mess
    of rhymes that hit and those that miss ...
    or should that go:
    You really help clear up the mess
    of rhymes that work and those that don't
    ~smile~

    Thanks for enlightening.

    Norm

  • Zahhar gold member
    February 4, 2006
    Edit | Reply
    i don't see why not. some will tell you it's not a real sonnet, but you can always say felt inclined to improvise.

  • jonestown tea silver member
    February 3, 2006
    Edit | Reply
    This is truly a little gem that I've stumbled upon. I am tired of free verse. I will try my hand at this approach. I shall bookmark this. Thank you for this column. I'm going to go nosy about others you posted. A qucik question. I've been learning how to write a basic sonnet. Can I use phonological parallelism in that too? I apologize if that question is ridiculous, but you can't learn anything if you don't ask. lol
  • Saint-Laurent
    October 5, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    I shall be reading more of your columns. I love the technical side and have decided to go off and really study poetry, for the fun of it.
    It's really cool that you generoulsy share your knowledge and time.

  • Robbwindow
    June 15, 2005
    Edit | Reply

    every aspect except accepted

    well I now have a morebroad misconceptions of just what it is that makes a rhyme. phonological parallelism of assonance and consonance between accented syllables for rhyme to occur. If the mind works better than before I read this peace then piece be with you . I understood but took a while the reconfigure this new task but to display in a submission is another thing we will see.

  • Utok Bulinaw
    June 3, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    I never had any idea of rhyme schemes. This article will help me a lot. Thank you so much. Bookmarking this. Cheers! Eris

  • Sai Babas Lotus
    June 3, 2005
    Edit | Reply

    Thank you very much for such wonderful enligh

    This is a very beautiful article and one I will cherish forever. I learnt alot from this and to me, at first, this was appearing quite like the "algebra of rhyme in poetry"

    It is fascinating to learn what you have so willingly shared with the AP community here. I have made a note of this article and will definitely try using some of the alternatives mentioned and explained here, in my longer poems.

    Once again, many thank you's to you for this.

    -Charishma

  • ArieLLeGiSeLLe
    June 1, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    I did not read the entirety of this text because it is a bit arduous. I myself was going to write a column on rhyme and it's overuse and I was glad to see someone recognized that verse is not the be-all, end-all of poetry. I think that you should write a mini column on this subject. Shortening this piece by taking the key points from it so that all may reAd and comprehend it would help get the message across that there is an alternative to rhyme.
    Much love
    Arielle Giselle
    Edited on Jun 01, 12:14 because ''.

  • Dragonsblood
    May 28, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    wow and I thought I was just speaking jibberish all this time lol my non rhyming poems actually in thier form has other forms of rhyme that I totally forgot about! Thank you for this wonderful article of information it has made me realize that there is much more to jibberish than meets the eye *winks*

  • punkrocksmidge
    May 25, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    Two words: Unbelievably helpful.

    Thanks, dear

  • Pamela A Lamppa gold member
    May 17, 2005
    Edit | Reply

    Amazing

    Excellent column with so much to take in and learn. Tackeling the Villanelle was tough, but my attempt at the Hybridanelle was grueling, but so much fun. I was junk for 1/2 a day afterwords. Great to read about these end rhyme schemes. So many different ways to use words for sound, effect, and form. Thank you for sharing such a wealth of knowledge. I know this will become a great resource page for me. ~Pam

  • April 11, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    cool

  • Dishy
    March 20, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    Terrific just printed it out .

  • Simbelmyne
    March 18, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    WOW. I haven't read it all yet, in fact, I've barely finished reading five paragraphs, and already I can see, this is an awesome and extremely informative article. I cannot thank you enough for compiling it, this is priceless information. I've been looking for information like this to use in homeschooling for an in-depth poetry unit/folder I'm compiling. This will definitely HELP so much as a resource. Thank you thank you thank you. I appreciate this beyond words. *bookmarks for future use* Man, you deserve some serious applause. Take care & God bless, Sim.

  • Zahhar gold member
    March 11, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    yep, these are all good points. i mostly wrote this article in preparation for and as a compliment to my article describing the hybridanelle--the first poetic form to my knowledge that use any type of phonemic or associative end-line parallelism the poet cares to use as its end-line scheme.

  • Rj
    March 11, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    Erin,

    This is an excellent technical discussion. Most poets, with talent tend to use these tools quite naturally, pretty much similar to learning to play music by ear. For them this is a great vocabulary booster.

    If you will permit me, I might add just a little additional commentary to the forgoing discussion.

    Quite honestly, I would really caution anyone against trying to turn poetry too much into a math equation. I once tried to write poetry on a spread sheet, and the results were quite frankly stifling, I'd call it screwed-up by the numbers. Poetry should be organic, growing from seed to root and leaf. An overly mechanical write sounds like the drone of a machine. But the knowledge of assonance and rhyme is most useful when you have similar words that both would work at a point in your poem. Given two words of similar read speed and brilliance it is usually safest and thereby advisable to pick up and bring forward a familiar sound repetition. When intuition fails rules come in very handy. The resultant effect of picking up an extra rhyme or assonance will usually smoothen or slicken the write.

    I might add one final note, it is actually possible to smoothen a write too much. A well placed touch of discordance can be very effective to reinforce a point, or to otherwise draw the readers attention. That of couse is anther topic.

    Again Erin, this was a fantastic presentation. It should be required reading by anyone considering writing poetry!

    Glad I found you.

    Peace,

    ~RJ~
  • poetaster
    March 8, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    Jesus! I had no idea about any of this. Being a poet who usually abhorrs using rhyme, I look for ways to play with meter and flow and I employed some of this with out even knowing it!! Thanks for the amazing tutorial, I might be tempted to play with traditional rhyme schemes but changing them to some of the parallelisms listed here. This was a pure golden find for me
  • AsYetFaithless
    March 1, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    This is a very nice article. I personally almost never rhyme my work, and don't pay much attention to form, but after reading this I can go back through my poems and identify the phonological parallelisms I did use without realizing it, and hopefully become concious of this when I write in the future, and grow as a writer.

  • Duana gold member
    March 1, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    Ah! "As you can see, the effect of end-line alliteration is different from the effect of end-line rhyme, yet it still has a potency not unlike the potency of rhyme. And, you have an entirely new pool of words to draw from just in using end-line alliteration. Imagine the pool of words you have to draw from between all seven of these schemes."

    This has completely opened my mind to new worlds. Now I get how they all fit together, and how important they are to being able to write what you really mean. I always felt so restricted by rhyme, like okay, what if there isn't a word that rhymes with what I mean- I can't write the poem I want to write but have to go with whatevcver rhymes. So this has opened up my mind.

    It would be great if you could do an article on basic meter and how to go about changing your lines around so that they are in metered form, but not the meaning. But I realize after writing that, this article will help with that too. Thanks again., This is superb, not just because you layed out the facts but moreso because you explained the neccessity of them.


  • myrataal silver member
    February 22, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    Well rhymed, Poet!

    Myra

  • Jaden silver member
    February 21, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    It's always fun (to some degree) taking things apart, figuring out why some things work and others don't.

  • Jaden silver member
    February 21, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    Extremely well written article. You could make a living doing this. Anyway, as good and informative as it is, it is probably over the heads of 98% of the people who write here. The serious writers, who are familiar with these schemes and implementations probably are more inclined to steer away form the hard core rhyming. . .

    Having said that, I liked the studious and professorial nature of this very worthy article.

    Good job.

  • JazzALTernative silver member
    February 19, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    This was a timely article for me. I've been putting up the good fight for a number of years now, seeking for ways words take on their own artistic spirit, not as second class citizens to music. It seems like a lot of poetic tradition is bound by rules of meter and rhyme, so as not to step on the toes of music, its master. Anyway, here I found a richness of possibilities with which to conform to music's needs as well make the spontaneous word painting.

  • Zahhar gold member
    February 18, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    lostsoul: well, feel free to share the link to this article with anyone you like.

  • Warrior7 Greeters member
    February 17, 2005
    Edit | Reply

    excellent

    this is absolutely fantastic, everyone should take a look at this because it is very useful and you've explained things well, although now i feel like my poetry is crap, but i shall carry on and learn. very well written thanks for sharing

  • Ink Shadow
    February 17, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    This is an interesting article...Well, rhyme has been abused in internet to a large extent, people immitating singing school or attempting to write in terza rima or similar adventures...which normally fail...Very few rhyme schemes are acceptable, and look complete in english...coz this is a language where we dont have a lot of rhyming words. Well then rhyming was borrowed from other indo european languages, not from latin...In latin besides a part of Carma Burana there is no semblance of rhyming!

    D


  • Taco Sauce
    February 15, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    I found this article incredibly helpful; thank you!
1 - 27 of 27