Read Contests Groups Learn Forums Store Help
 

Discovering the Anapaest and the Dactyl

Describes the anapaest and the dactyl, two important metrical units in English poetry.

 


This article expands on the article "Discovering the Iamb and the Trochee".

 

The anapaest (‘an uh ,pest) and the dactyl (‘dact ul) are each a foot consisting of three syllables. The anapaest consists of two unaccented syllables followed by an accented syllable. In a way, it can be looked at as an extension of the iamb in that it uses one more unaccented syllable. The dactyl consists of an accented syllable followed by two unaccented syllables, and this can be looked at as an extension of the trochee for the same reason.

 

The anapaest and the dactyl occur naturally in poetry, but they can sometimes be very difficult to use intentionally, placing them in particular locations in compliance with metrical schemes. It is fairly rare that a line of three or more feet will be purely anapaestic (,an uh ‘pest ick) or dactlyic (dac ‘till ick). Generally, these feet are mixed in with iambs and trochees.

 

What I see the anapaest and the dactyl doing is creating variation in lines of poetry that would otherwise be overly iambic or trochaic. Purely iambic or trochaic lines of poetry can create powerful, stately presentations that are sonorous and rich in texture. Such lines of poetry can establish heavy and contemplative moods in the reader. Conversely, the iamb and trochee are also quite capable of conveying lightheartedness and whimsy. Naturally occurring in language, the anapaest and the dactyl tend to work with the iamb and trochee to accentuate mood and texturize ideas. For the poet who is interested in exploring the way these feet affect language, their effect can be used consciously to accentuate particular elements in a line and create certain textures.

 

Because such prosodic effects on the reader are largely subjective and subconscious, it becomes difficult to discuss exactly what combinations of feet will create which effects on a reader in relation to the language content. It is impossible to know or to generalize. However, the poet can explore the use of the anapaest and the dactyl and come to his or her own conclusions based on experimentation and practice.

 

As with the iamb and the trochee, information about the anapaest and the dactyl from a purely technical standpoint is abundant, yet there are not a lot of examples that demonstrate their use in diverse structures. Starting with the anapaest, I will exemplify them in detail so that they may be seen to work functionally. Classical prosody used a slash (/) and a "U" to indicate accented (/) and unaccented (U) syllables. I have developed my own notation, which I feel is more appropriate. I use the period (.) for unaccented syllables and the dash (-) for accented syllables.

 

Let's start looking at line structures. Following are five examples of anapaestic lines, starting from the shortest possible line containing an anapaest, a single anapaest, to a line containing five anapaestic feet. After each example line below, I provide its notation and a parenthesized division of the line’s anapaests followed by some notes.

 

I look west

 

. . -

 

(I look west)

 

A line containing a single anapaest. If some emphasis is put on the first word, "I", this line will not be an anapaest. One of the challenges in working with meter is taking into consideration the different ways a line can be scanned. I chose this particular combination of words to exemplify an anapaest because the word "look" will generally suppress a potentially "accentuable" preceding syllable, and the word "west" will generally do the same. So, "look" should hopefully suppress the accentuation of "I" while "west" should in turn do the same with "look", making this an anapaest. Consider also that an existing metrical scheme will often influence the way a particular line reads one way or the other. As you continue looking at these examples, bear in mind that the first syllable of a line opening with an anapaest could potentially be accentuated, depending on variables.

 

So I look to the west

 

. . - . . -

 

(So I look) (to the west)

 

A line containing two anapaestic feet. Two-foot lines are referred to as a "dimeter" (nounal) or "bimetric" (adjectival), so this is called anapaestic dimeter.

 

There I stood at the edge of the world

 

. . - . . - . . -

 

(There I stood) (at the edge) (of the world)

 

A line containing three anapaestic feet. Three-foot lines are referred to as "trimeter" or "trimetric", so this is called anapaestic trimeter.

 

Here I stand by the edge of a lake in my dream

 

. . - . . - . . - . . -

 

(Here I stand) (by the edge) (of a lake) (in my dream)

 

A line containing four anapaestic feet. Four-foot lines are referred to as "tetrameter" or "tetrametric", so this is called anapaestic tetrameter. By now you may be starting to see why purely anapaestic lines three feet or longer are fairly rare. Try reading this tetrameter out loud a couple of times. It is in the nature of the anapaest and the dactyl to speed up the flow of language. When you have three or more of them in a row it can begin to sound like another language altogether when spoken out loud because the verbal pace becomes so quickened. This is also why I am only providing examples up to five feet, because it is really not worth your time or mine to study lines beyond five feet that are purely anapaestic or dactylic.

 

Then I went to a place where the angels were dancing in pairs

 

. . - . . - . . - . . - . . -

 

(Then I went) (to a place) (where the an)(gels were danc)(ing in pairs)

 

A line containing five anapaestic feet. Five-foot lines are referred to as "pentameter" or "pentametric", so this is called anapaestic pentameter. You may have heard people refer to a poem as having a bad case of the "iambic trots", but I am here to tell you that the iambic trots are far, far more preferable than the "anapestic gallops". This line is an example only. I think the average reader would be hard pressed to find an actual line of English poetry that is a pure anapaestic pentameter, and I doubt that four lines in a row, a quatrain, presently even exists that is written in pure anapaestic pentameter. Consider that a line of catalectic trochaic octameter (eight trochees with the final unaccented syllable omitted) will contain as many syllables as this example line, but will read more easily. So that you may compare such a line to the above, I’ll demonstrate the dramatic difference:

 

Angels dance in pairs on nimbus clouds to celebrate the dawn

 

- . - . - . - . - . - . - . -

 

(Angels) (dance in) (pairs on) (nimbus) (clouds to) (cele)(brate the) (dawn)

 

I plan to dedicate another article to the identification of different types of lines in poetry.

 

The dactyl is of course the exact inverse of the anapaest, with the first syllable accented instead of the last. As with the anapaest, or any foot, the dactyl can be comprised of a single word, multiple words, or parts of words. In the illustrating examples above and below, you’ll notice that I split words between the parenthesized feet, and that more than a single word often comprises a foot.

 

Here are five examples of dactylic lines, starting again from the shortest possible line containing a dactyl, a single dactyl, to a line containing five dactylic feet.

 

Poisonous!

 

- . .

 

(Poisonous)

 

A line containing a single dactyl. I chose a single word to illustrate a line that contains a single dactyl because it is easy to accentuate the last syllable of a dactyl when that last syllable is its own word. Compare the word "poisonous" to the phrase "listen now". This of course would change the way the line is scanned. Even with the word "poisonous" by itself, there is a slight accentuation of the final syllable, bordering on becoming a secondary accent. This will often happen when a dactyl occurs at the close of a line. Please bear this in mind as you continue to read the examples below.

 

Why are you questioning?

 

- . . - . .

 

(Why are you) (questioning)

 

A line containing two dactylic feet. This is called dactylic dimeter.

 

Answers should hold to your questioning

 

- . . - . . - . .

 

(Answers should) (hold to your) (questioning)

 

A line containing three dactylic feet. This is called dactylic trimeter.

 

Something is wrong with these cookie-cut bungalows

 

- . . - . . - . . - . .

 

(Something is) (wrong with these) (cookie-cut) (bungalows)

 

A line containing four dactylic feet. This is called dactylic tetrameter. Note that the word "bungalow" generally has a secondary accent on its final syllable, which would normally be counted into the meter. However, because of the force of the preceding dactyls, that final accent seems to be suppressed considerably. This accentual interrelationship within and between lines of poetry is something really worth meditating upon when working with meter. As I’ve pointed out before, the lines surrounding a given line in a poem will have influence on that line’s meter. Many of the lines I use as examples will read differently when juxtaposed with other lines of varying meters.

 

Thousands of silver-back grunion now flip in prosperity

 

- . . - . . - . . - . . - . .

 

(Thousands of) (silver-back) (grunion now) (flip in pro)(sperity)

 

A line containing five dactylic feet. This is called dactylic pentameter. Note again that that final syllable could be accented, and some will probably read it thus because the length of this particular pentameter will make it tempting.

 

As I mentioned before, anapaests and dactyls are generally mixed in with iambs and trochees. It is very rare that you’ll see an anapaestic or dactylic pentameter in your reading of poetry, especially since readers will often subconsciously shift some of the syllables in a long series of anapaests or dactyls in order to slow down the pace.

Included in the list

Add a comment

    : Comment:

Comments

1 - 20 of 20

  • Zahhar gold member
    March 15, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    Inscrutable: actually, I get into that a little in the article that follows this one.

    Three Useful Concepts in Scansion: allpoetry.com/Column/1041978

  • Inscrutable
    March 15, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    And amphibrachs. Accented syllable in the middle.
    http://allpoetry.com/Poem/768029

  • Zahhar gold member
    February 5, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    ziniicecream: the funny thing about english is this relationship between accent, intonation and quantity that is very difficult to grasp. i am only beginning to understand meter and a little of how intonation affects the rhythm of a line. rhythm is not the same as the line's meter, which is the division of a line into metrical feet. rhythm and meter can be different, but are generally lined up very naturally. it's something i'm just in the last week beginning to really think about and ponder.


  • ziniicecream
    February 3, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    Thank you for this challenging article. I've studied prosodic elements in Spanish classes, since accentuation is so crucial in that language, but my professors are always right, understanding English accentuation is much more difficult.

    I shall return several times to ponder this article.


  • M.A.King
    February 3, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    I cannot even tell you how helpful this column is to me in my recent efforts to learn these meters! Clear and detailed and invaluable to me. I will bookmark this for future reference and I send you a huge THANK YOU!


  • haikumonk gold member
    February 2, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    I think I will stick to haiku.... now I'm going to go drink myself to sleep.... !



    Don


  • windhover3 gold member
    February 2, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    hey Erin, thanks for the compliment, but I'm a dabbler just like everyone else around here... It's all just a matter of having read different things, I think. The book by Robert Pinsky that I am referring to is a fairly recent publication (199 in paperbck) "The Sounds of Poetry: A Brief Guide" which I think I've seen recently in bookstores. I'm unaware of any recent re-leases of Swinburne's poems, but he should be available in the library, or if you like cheap books, Dover has a series of thrift editions ($1-$4 bucks, www.doverpublications.com). Their "Pre-Raphaelite Poetry" has 16 of his poems. He did also write a good deal of criticism, but I've only read excerts.

    I'll definitely look at the next article. i read your first, and probably should have commented, but I really didn't have much to say. I keep intending to write an article on variable meter, but I keep putting it off. I do enjoy the discourse, keep it up. On the off chance you aren't familiar with it, I'll finish with a plug for Lewis Turco's "New Book of Forms". The final two-thirds of the book is a presentation of different poetic forms, but the first third is a great short essay on the different elements of poetry. I've found it tremendously useful as a structuring frame for thinking about poems and poetry.

    Hope you have a great night,
    Brian

  • Zahhar gold member
    February 2, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    windhover: I'm jealous of how well read you are. Pinsky and Swinburn are only in my sites, I haven't yet had the time to delve into them. If you happen to know of a single book that illustrates the poetry and ideas of such writers as you have mentioned, I'd very much like to know the title.

    I'll definitely think on and figure out a way to exemplify a better monometer anapaest. It's really tough because the accent seems to really want to shift around. Maybe I should settle for a single word the way I did with the monometer dactyl.

    I found your thoughts very refreshing and enjoyable. I hope you'll look at the next article that I'm working on, too. It expands on this and the previous article, proposing a system by which metrical schemes may be identified in a way that I feel is simple and straight-forward. But, we'll see. I have a feeling you'll find some holes in it and I'm actually looking forward to learning what you'll have to say about the next article I'll be posting.
    Edited on Feb 02, 10:43 p.m. because ''.

  • windhover3 gold member
    February 2, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    the anapest is my favorite foot, and I use them throughout, my favorite single line of verse is the last of Fern Hill (3 anapests), and I'm a huge fan of Pavese whose rhythm is anapest driven (I'll leave Swinburne alone for the moment). Not surprisingly, then, I was a little dsapointed in seeing the role of these two feet described as breaking up iambs, but empirically, that's how they will primarilly be used.

    I thought this was well presented. I might suggest changing the first example ("I look west"). Absent of any springing or pre-established pattern all three syllables seem very close in accentual weight, In fact, I tend to read the line in isolation with the most stress on "look". In contrast, your second example is... well... exemplary.

    The issue of whether a line will be read as anapestic or dactylic pentameter is an interesting one (I thought your example quite good), and largely dependent on the pre-established rhythm. The dominant meter of Swinburne's "Hymn to Prosperpine" is a line of 2 anapests, an iamb, 2 anapests, and he is such a strong craftsman, that I think the meter is maintained very well throughout. But I buy Pinsky's distinction between meter and rhythm.... the prescriptive underlying grid of idealized accent will never perfectly describe an actual line, and the natural feel of a line will allow for various post-facto descriptions.

    Very well done. I'm not sure she was the first to advance the argument, and it isn't a central thesis, but Annie Finch suggested that the emergence of free verse was partially driven by the emergence of meters based on the triple foot. With so many people on this site constantly trying to force things into iambic, it is nice to see the trple foot get some careful attention.

    Brian


  • February 2, 2005
    Edit | Reply

    understandable

    hm. i like this for two reasons: it's well written and it makes sense. (they work better together, though it's very hard to find things like that.)

  • Zahhar gold member
    February 2, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    Claide! Thank you for your kind words. I have not written a poem purely in dactyls or anapaests thus far. I guess I haven't really thought of such a thing as worth spending time on. I know what the flow and the feel of the anapaestic and dactylic lines are for me, but so far I have not encountered something I wish to express that would fit with purely anapaestic or dactylic lines. For the time being, I use these feet consciously or unconsciously as parts of elaborate metrical schemes. A poem of mind you mind find interesting that used the anapaests and the dactyls consciously is "The Release". They're each in a prescribed location all the way throughout the poem.


  • Claide
    February 2, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    Firstly I'd like to say, I appreciate your spending time explaining this! As I've mentioned before, the class I'm teaching generally covers Iambs, Trochees, Anapests, Dactyls, and Spondees. To see a poem in perfect Iambs always delights me! It's a rare sight here on all poetry, but if you're going to see anything, it will be Iambs. Trochees are, of course, less common than Iambs and never have I seen a solid trochaic piece here. Dactyls and Anapests... A handful to nothing. I've written a poem recently in anapestic trimeter (with refrain lines) and I'm currently working on more. I've also written one in dactyls, though even this poem has syllable crutches. It's nice to see a poet who understands and possibly 'hears' these meters! I will make sure to stop by and read your work some time. Have you, yourself written any poetry with Anapests or Dactyls?! I'd love to read some one elses poetry with such meter, for once!

    Carry on! I'll refer some of my students to this page if they'd like to further solidify their learnings. Thank you for your time .

    - The hope poet


  • MargaretG
    February 2, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    You really know what you are talking about. Well done.


  • Wolf of Night
    February 1, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    Wow I just learned alot of new termonology! I may have to read this a few dozen more times to fully grasp the over all concepts of this but I did find it interesting and enlightening. Alot of us here dont know all this about the terms and the arrangement of the words to create this termonology> Like I said before I just write. I do like the fact that you did this if nothing else I will know what people are talking about now when they use these terms in comments! Thank you!


  • masterblaster gold member
    February 1, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    I would like to thank you for posting this, it went straight into my memory bank in my computer to be digested at lesiure, we need more of these writes, they are very helpful to the serous poets,many thanka


  • ca ne fait rien
    February 1, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    Erin, you have laid these building blocks of poetry and language out as if they were Archimedes' bath. I just climbed in and yelled Eureka, now I understand. (Well metaphorically anyway). Thanks for taking the time to do all this. I am sure I am not the only one to appreciate it.


  • SomnusLupus
    January 31, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    cool


  • a humble servant
    January 31, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    yes well done!


  • zola
    January 31, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    very useful, thanks


  • DelWarrenLivingston silver member
    January 31, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    Another excellent piece of writing, Erin. Although I have read literally thousands of poems and have understood a thing or two about scansion for many years, my personal knowledge is but a small grain of sand on the beach of your knowledge where the grunion flop.
    (I couldn't resist.) Thank you for yet another most informative and enlightening lesson which I hope is viewed by many. I have said it before, and it bears repeating, your generosity to share this information on a public site is overwhelming and greatly appreciated and I applaude you for doing so.

    Thank-you, my friend.

    Del

1 - 20 of 20