Read Contests Groups Learn Forums Store Help
 

Discovering the Iamb and the Trochee

Describes the iamb and the trochee, two common metrical units in English poetry.

 


It seems to me that today's writers of poetry do not appreciate the power of meter in poetry, specifically the iamb and the trochee. When experimented with, it generally tends to be just that, an experiment and nothing more. Today's poets don't seem to use the iamb and the trochee for their emotive capabilities and rhythmic potentials.

 

In some ways, there even appears to exist animosity towards certain, if not all, aspects of classical prosody. It is as if it has been forgotten, or maybe most poets today simply can't accept, that such devices as the iamb and the trochee are simply tools in a rather large toolbox of techniques, methods, and styles.

 

You don't have to have an ounce of skill using and understanding prosodic feet to write good poetry, but it helps.

 

Information about the iamb and the trochee from a purely technical standpoint is abundant, yet there are not a lot of examples that demonstrate their use in diverse structures. Starting with the iamb, I will tell you precisely what the iamb and trochee are, and then exemplify them in detail so that they may be seen to work functionally. The iamb and the trochee are each a type of verbal metrical unit known as a foot. There are several types of feet, of which I feel only four are really applicable to the accentual nature of English poetry; however, this will be an article for another time.

 

The iamb is a foot consisting of an unaccented syllable followed by an accented syllable. A metrical foot can be comprised of a single word or parts of words. Classical prosody used a slash (/) and a "U" to indicate accented (/) and unaccented (U) syllables. I have developed my own notation, which I feel is more appropriate. I use the period (.) for unaccented syllables and the dash (-) for accented syllables.

 

Let's start looking at line structures. Following are eight examples of iambic lines, starting from the shortest possible line containing an iamb, a single iamb, to a line containing eight iambic feet. After each example line below, I provide its notation and a parenthesized division of the line’s iambs followed by some notes.

 

I sighed

 

. -

 

(I sighed)

 

A line containing a single iambus.

 

I heaved a sigh

 

. - . -

 

(I heaved) (a sigh)

 

A line containing two iambic feet. Two-foot lines are referred to as a "dimeter" (nounal) or "bimetric" (adjectival), so this is called iambic dimeter.

 

I heaved my sighs in vain

 

. - . - . -

 

(I heaved) (my sighs) (in vain)

 

A line containing three iambic feet. Three-foot lines are referred to as "trimeter" or "trimetric", so this is called iambic trimeter.

 

I found myself among the trees

 

. - . - . - . -

 

(I found) (myself) (among) (the trees)

 

A line containing four iambic feet. Four-foot lines are referred to as "tetrameter" or "tetrametric", so this is called iambic tetrameter.

 

I found myself awake among the trees

 

. - . - . - . - . -

 

(I found) (myself) (awake) (among) (the trees)

 

A line containing five iambic feet. Five-foot lines are referred to as "pentameter" or "pentametric", so this is called iambic pentameter. The iambic pentameter is thought of as the most commonly used meter in English poetry. This is probably true. Popular users of the iambic pentameter include Shakespeare, John Milton, and Robert Service. There are of course many more well known users of the iambic pentameter.

 

I woke from desert dreams among the dripping trees

 

. - . - . - . - . - . -

 

(I woke) (from des)(ert dreams) (among) (the drip)(ping trees)

 

A line consisting of six iambic feet. Six-foot lines are referred to as "hexameter" or "hexametric", so this is called iambic hexameter. The hexameter was very popular in Hellenistic (ancient Greek) poetry. But, keep in mind that Greek is not an accented language. The iamb in Greek pertained to a short and a long syllable, not an unaccented and an accented syllable. Oddly, English prosody uses terms from Grecian prosody despite English being such a dramatically different language from Greek.

 

I woke again from desert dreams among the dripping trees

 

. - . - . - . - . - . - . -

 

(I woke) (again) (from des)(ert dreams) (among) (the drip)(ping trees)

 

A line consisting of seven iambic feet. Seven-foot lines are referred to as "heptameter" or "heptametric", so this is called iambic heptameter. They are also sometimes called by "septameter". For the heptameter to really work, regardless of the type of feet used, there must be some natural pause within the line. This pause is known as the caesura (see 'syoor ah). They can exist in a line of any length. In this line, the caesura is occurring just after the fourth foot, at the close of the word "dreams".

 

I woke again from desert dreams among the dripping redwood trees

 

. - . - . - . - . - . - . - . -

 

(I woke) (again) (from des)(ert dreams) (among) (the drip)(ing red)(wood trees)

 

A line of eight iambic feet. You might guess how these are referenced, "octameter" or "octometric", so this is called iambic octameter. Notice how the 4th, 7th and 8th feet split words. The words aren't actually split when you read, just when analyzing the prosodic structure of the line. In this line the caesura also occurs after the fourth foot. Caesuras can also occur in the middle of a foot.

 

The dreaded octameter can be extremely overwhelming. I've only used this meter once in all my years of writing. You can see it fully exemplified in that poem (My Love). You'll notice that this poem makes use of the caesura between the forth and fifth feet in order to allow for the option to breath while reading.

 

The trochee (‘trow kee) is the exact inverse of the iamb. It is a foot consisting of an accented syllable followed by an unaccented syllable. As with the iamb, or any foot, the trochee can be comprised of a single word or parts of words. In the illustrating examples above and below, you’ll notice that I split several words between the parenthesized feet.

 

Here are eight examples of trochaic (trah ‘kay ik) lines, starting again from the shortest possible line containing a trochee, a single trochee, to a line containing eight trochaic feet.

 

Listen!

 

- .

 

(Listen)

 

A line containing a single trochee.

 

Who is crying?

 

- . - .

 

(Who is) (crying)

 

A line containing two trochaic feet. This is called trochaic dimeter.

 

Hear his tender crying?

 

- . - . - .

 

(Hear his) (tender) (crying)

 

A line containing three trochaic feet. This is called trochaic trimeter.

 

Listen to that rolling thunder!

 

- . - . - . - .

 

(Listen) (to that) (rolling) (thunder)

 

A line containing four trochaic feet. This is called trochaic tetrameter.

 

Thunders peel across the sundered heavens

 

- . - . - . - . - .

 

(Thunders) (peel a)(cross the) (sundered) (heavens)

 

A line containing five trochaic feet. This is called trochaic pentameter.

 

Heaven seemed to split beneath the flash of lightning

 

- . - . - . - . - . - .

 

(Heaven) (seemed to) (split be)(neath the) (flash of) (lightning)

 

A line consisting of six trochaic feet. This is called trochaic hexameter.

 

All the world fell silent when the thunder thinned to silence

 

- . - . - . - . - . - . - .

 

(All the) (world fell) (silent) (when the) (thunder) (thinned to) (silence)

 

A line consisting of seven trochaic feet. This is called trochaic heptameter.

 

Here alone I found a place I now could call my only haven

 

- . - . - . - . - . - . - . - .

 

(Here a)(lone I) (found a) (place I) (now could) (call my) (only) (haven)

 

A line of eight trochaic feet. This is called trochaic octameter.

 

Note the presence of that the natural pause I mentioned above. It occurs in all the longer lines, starting with the pentameter. When the pause is very brief, I call this a soft caesura, when it is longer and more pronounced, I call this a hard caesura. Note that in the trochaic octameter a hard caesura occurs just after the word "place", causing the second half of the line to feel more iambic than trochaic. I’ll actually devote an article specifically to caesura and hemistiches sometime down the road. These can be useful to understand in their own right.

Included in the list

Add a comment

    : Comment:

Comments

1 - 39 of 39

  • vondain
    December 6, 2007
    Edit | Reply
    how do you understand the difference between accent and stress when writing?

    • Zahhar gold member
      December 6, 2007
      Edit | Reply
      In English they're just about the same.

      • vondain
        December 8, 2007
        Edit | Reply
        i wrote that wrong, I meant between stressed and unaccented

        • Zahhar gold member
          December 8, 2007
          Edit | Reply
          Well, it's natural. The speech does it for you. For instance, I'll underline the accents in your line:

          I wrote that wrong, I meant between stressed and unaccented.

          See? Speech just handles it automatically. Some words have different accents depending on their usage, like "moderate" as a verb and "moderate" as an adjective.
  • Kay Laon Anders
    January 25, 2006
    Edit | Reply
    Woah.........I don't think i realised how popular you are on this site. Oh well on to my comment: I get the iamb thing now but i still can't see the difference between it and the trochee. I know all about accented and unaccented stuff but it still looks like your just counting syllables to me. Do you always measure while you are writing your trisects and is that one of the rules to your trisect form?

  • Zahhar gold member
    February 8, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    debejay: ahh! wonderful! thank you. yes i think i have to agree with you. though, i am beginning to get an idea of what sort of free verse i really like, but there's not much of the free verse being written that fits my particular tastes. if you want to see an example of what i personally have a taste for, my poem "Finale" or "A Christmas Poem" (it's not really about christmas). i would point you to a free verse poem from another author to illustrate what i mean, but i can't think of any off the top of my head (hate it when that happens). thanks again for coming back and clarifying. i've now had the pleasure of being able to quite enjoy your thoughts.
    Edited on Feb 08, 1:54 because ''.

  • February 7, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    Hi Erin (from Canada).
    My point is that I believe that it is easy to read a rhyming style poem and readily tell whether it is good or bad. Not just the content, but the rhythm. It sort of hits you. I like to read poems by any master poet as they seem to have that rythm that doesn't exist in the unstructured free form. "The Charge of the Light Brigade" is a favourite, is easily recognised as a very good poem.

    On the other hand, I have tried to read free-form poetry, and apart from the content, I haven't read much that I like. (There is an Irishman who formed his well but I cannot think of his name - I know there are many good writers of this form.)

    The bottom line is, I think it is harder to tell bad free-form poetry from the good, and I see much "crap" being written that is nothing more than a few sentences laid out with some fancy "structure". I liked your article.

  • Zahhar gold member
    February 7, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    debejay: i'm interested in understanding what it is you have said here, but i am finding your comment difficult to decipher. if you wanted to return and elaborate on your comment and help me understand how it relates to my article, i'll look forward to that. if not, this is also okay. just letting you know that i had trouble understanding your comment in hopes that you'll feel some desire to clarify it.

  • February 6, 2005
    Edit | Reply

    I will read more of your work

    I don't know where I read this; but it is easy to spot "bad" rhyming poetry of any form, and it is hard to spot "good" unstructured (freeform) poetry. Perhaps that's a good case for some guidelines.
  • Living Passion
    February 6, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    I was recommended to this column by Mary6 as I have recently begun writing Shakespearan sonnets and asked for some advice. We have been learning, in passing about iambs in English classes at school but it was very nice to be able to sit down and read this. I hadn't learned anything about the trochee yet, and I find it interesting. I would have to agree with you that people do not use meter so much anymore. I think a lot of power has gone out of modern writing, it often sounds so tired. I find poems with some form of meter, even just a basic attempt at it, so much easier to get into. I liked this column, it was informative and helpful, without being too wordy. I believe I shall add you to my favorites as you seem to have a lot to offer in the way of instruction to a novice poet like myself. Keep up the good work! God bless
    ~Stefani~

  • NicoleAlyce
    February 4, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    Wow this was really long but definitly worth the read, i also agree with the previous statement about the metric timing you are clever with your words and you know how to get the timing right too, i envy you.
    Nicole

  • silica silver member
    February 3, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    I’ve always had a fear of stress… uneven in my axials
    And therefore call DA-de-de my lovely terror dactyl,
    Nor could I get to grips with less – I do hokey trochee,
    My anapaest is not the best… my lamb ends up all smoky.

    But still I think it quite a feat… your feet in metric timing,
    And reading these, I’ll swiftly seize the true imperial rhyming!

    I have a job to hear the stresses but I think reading your articles a few more times I’ll get there… or at least closer. Thank you!
  • mandrill
    February 3, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    Poetry is poetry - words, Johm, tgo make us smile and frown. You can accredit it to this and thatb but he fact remains we are here and we do NOT live by rukes, but are free in out thoughts. There will always be balance in respect of readers looking on the words we produce. Goodnight.
  • Dr John Celes
    February 3, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    nothing wrong in any form of Poetry.it all depends upon what comes out from your heart and what you are capable of.A lot of paraphernalia that add beauty to poetry are missed in this way.each one will have readers who appreciate and mock as well.that's all!
  • mandrill
    February 3, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    Don't get me wrong, I do love form poetry and write a lot of it, but i think it is down to us to decide which way we want to travel. Perhaps both in the quest. Whatever, I do think though, that you should lighten up in your approach, no matter that you are frustrated to see others messing words up, we must have patience. Anyway, keep smiling, keep writing and stop being the teach with the ruler ready to slap knuckles joke!
  • mandrill
    February 3, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    Sorry Erin for my passions, but these are my thoughts. I believe we do not not need these rules. We are free. Excuse my typing please I am rubbish at typing.
  • mandrill
    February 3, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    In reply to Dr JC
    And what is wrong with free verse and sh9orteer verse? Are we to be snobs in our ways of writing that we shrug off what we do not like because we do not like? Others enjoy that medium, we should not appear to say it is wrong, even if we do not mean that. Fashion, blah - we make the waves with out pushingt forward with words. But, should we use the same old same old same old to create? If we are individual in our approach, then surely we can have the stars as our markers, and beyond, there are no set rules to poetry. Once you understand that then you smile. Forms are all well and good for practice, but to be free in wrining we need only our minds.
  • mandrill
    February 3, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    But what do your care, Erin? Why is it important that others see what you see? Surely they will along the road of discovery, if they chose so. I am times five. Please explaine more the trochee so th everyday reader can see! It's no use whining if peoplke do not understand what you speak of to begin with. But what is wrong with experiment? Surely when you first started you experimented, We live and learn. But what of free verse? Can we not bend the rukes to suit us if we choose? Being a poet is not just respecting the ways of form but also bending them to our needs. In my opinion you don't need to know these things to be a poet, but writing from the heart is a beginning, then we may, if we so choose develop ourselves and our words. Feet - perhaps in the technical you lose other people, some people just want to be shown the way not preached to, Strong-weak-Strong weak-etc - I understand you are trying to help but realise this - not everyone is at the same level as you are, do not be so bossy! Take time to work with PEOPLE rather than just throw explanations out to the masses as it seems yo do here. Just my opinion.


  • SuZyCuE
    February 2, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    I have been following your work for a while now, always checking to see your new stuff. When I came across this column I was simply overjoyed. I have been struggling with learning the iamb pentameter for sometime now, being a big fan of the sonnets of William Shakespere Ive always wanted to be able to write a sonnet of my own, however that pesky pentameter was always getting in my way lol, Ive read over your article about 5 times now and I think Im finaly understanding this. You have written it in very simple terms with great examples of the iamb and the trochee, Thank you so much for sharing this with us

  • Dragon Flame
    February 1, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    interesting information, i do occasionally write poems in iambic style, but less trochaic, however i do think that you will find that a caesura is punctuation within a line, like a colon, semi colon or full stop, rather than a pause of some sort. rach x

  • cc
    February 1, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    i dont remembeer alot of poetry rules(?) from class but it seems i have used this before quite by accident.one cant help but include some of the different styles as one goes into writting more.
  • IfOnlyLifeWereFair
    January 31, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    WOOHOOOOO! It's an Ap english class revisited

  • Methusala
    January 31, 2005
    Edit | Reply

    good

    I enjoyed the lesson, and will try to use it in the future.

    ~DK Rolls
  • dewbee
    January 31, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    i think there is a growing interest, as the pendulum swings, in classical forms of poetry.... the trend is that the style becomes choked and clogged with overuse and drops back for a long while as the backlash provides a new genre... totally unstructured, free verse, and more prosaic forms of poetry result... i guess if your were after labels you could call it post-modern poetry... and this resurgence of latin poetry and more classical forms of expression within the modern context is a kind of neo-classicism.... we are looking at ideals from the other side of things... challenged by our 'freedom' we seek to hang what we have found upon the framework of stricter structures to let it dry into ... well, what???... what next????

  • Zahhar gold member
    January 31, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    Keith: I want you to know that I've enjoyed the thoughts you've posted here, on my author page, and on "Stormlight". I'm on the road right now and attempting to write several articles whilst I travel, so my time is quite limited for the time being, and will continue to be pretty limited even after I'm back home in Portland because I have a bunch of time consuming poetry-related things planned. I'll try to respond to your comment on "Stormlight" soon, as I have some thoughts in response already swimming around in my head.

  • Kelsey-Jo
    January 31, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    I learned about Iamb last year... but I will admit that I was intimidated by it. Perhaps I really should try it out some time. Very informative post. Thanks for sharing!

    Kelso~

  • Zahhar gold member
    January 31, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    Claide: Hrrm, you're right, in part. I can't even find "bimeter" at this point. Wonder where it was I came across it. What I have in my OED is "dimeter" (no "a", which makes it an entirely different word). I'll update.

  • agazeley gold member
    January 31, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    This is a wonderful piece and easy to understand for us uninitiated – I really enjoy poetry, and would love to learn more – Growing up during a war meant that there was a great shortage of any sort of teacher – and poetry was never part of the curriculum for the working class at most schools – and we were out earning a living by the time we were 14 and in the air force at 20. . . so iamb and trochee have never been part of my vocabulary – consequently classical prosody has not been forgotten, it was never known!!

    Like many my poetry is self acquired – beginning with nursery rhymes and then polished by browsing in card shops LOL – Thank you for this explanation it is much appreciated – I will now go out and buy a book, but such books are often to complex whilst this explanation is simplicity itself.

    I do put meter and rhythm into some poems but this is just a natural gift and just happens by accident rather than planning on my part – like sports, some people have a gift whilst some spend hours with a coach.
    Putting prosody aside for a moment – the one thing that does bother me on AP is the general rudeness and swearing that occurs amongst young members – but lack of manners and courtesy have become a way of life it seems – Progress doesn’t always mean improvement, young people seem to think that a lack of manners shows confidence . . . Anyway that’s another story . . .Thanks again – Albert.

    Edited on Jan 31, 5:27 p.m. because ''.

  • Claide
    January 31, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    Yay! 'Tis my class (learning, iambs, trochees, dactyls, anapests, and spondees). You did a very good job, here. I've always longed to see more meter used, as almost always I write in a strict one.

    One thing! Make sure you check up on the 'bimeter' because in all studies I've done on it, it is:

    monometer
    diameter
    trimeter
    tetrameter...

    and so on. Do cross reference though, I wouldn't want to mis lead you .

  • heartnsoul
    January 31, 2005
    Edit | Reply

    what Deathrodemeover said.

    THANK YOU ! I am bookmarking this and printing it out so I will have it nearby for referrence. There was a class here that I wanted to take and was so disappointed that I couldn't take it because I couldn't devote the time (for personal reasons)necessary. I truly appreciate it when people such as yourself share your knowledge with others. It's what makes this site so wonderful!
    ~Michelle~
  • NomDePlume silver member
    January 31, 2005
    Edit | Reply

    humbled and gratefull

    Amazing!
    Thank you for reminding us that peotry is composed of the natural rhythms of life that you so well defined here...You are a teacheer par exlaunce'
    Thank you for sharing...MORE! MORE!

  • qnhoneybee
    January 31, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    Ok and your class starts when? I have been searching forever for someone to teach me how to write with iambs in a way that I can understand it and this did a pretty good job. I do like the way a poem reads when the correct iambs are used. The flow is so much smoother. I like to write Sonnets so of course my general useage has been the iambic pentameter. My problem is being able to tell which words have stressed syllables and which words have unstressed. I just learned on the internet that most of your nouns, adjectives, verbs and adverbs are stressed where as your conjunctions and the rest do not. Is this true? This was very informative article and one I greatly appreciate as I can bookmark it and use it as a reference. Thank-you!
  • oneluckygirl
    January 31, 2005
    Edit | Reply

    Precise and ultimately clear

    I knew I'd seen this before. Interesting changes you've made. Could someone possibly be editting in preparation for teaching here? I do find the alterations you made to your examples interesting as well.

    I can't tell if this all seems smoother because of now knowing more about your work, or because of the changes you've made. But, indeed it does.

    (kind of a zen question though, isn't it?) lol

    Jane


  • January 30, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    i find this intersting.

    ive never taken a seminar or a poetry class. i probably never will. but i appreicate this quick 101.

    thnk you

  • barutha
    January 30, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    good poem. very original concept.

  • ca ne fait rien
    January 30, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    Thanks Erin for presenting this in such a way that everyone could immediately understand it. Keith has made many valid points. Living in Yorkshire that has differently inflected speech than other parts of England, maybe sometimes more akin to Scottish sometimes, when I write I have to chew around the stressed syllables myself. The same goes for reading poems, and I usually check to see where an author is from (and as Keith says, the age of the poet can make a difference as well) that I can mentally picture the speech patterns as translated into the poetry. I remember when we studied R.S.Thomas at school, or teacher told us to read his poems with a Welsh accent- the beauty and music of them suddenly became apparent, whereas before they seemed dead on the page. It was like seeing something in 3D.
    I also hope that people read this and learn.

  • Keith
    January 30, 2005
    Edit | Reply
    Good to hear about iambs and trochees again. I love scansion. We used to have to do this in English (that's forty years ago, at school). I've always reckoned iambic pentameter caught on because we've got five fingers (well, most of us) which makes syllable counting a breeze. The Greeks have a lot to answer for. It'll be anaepests next I've no doubt. Seriously though, I think counting syllables is excellent language training.
    You might find this interesting. It's always said that Britain and America are two nations divided by a single language. I'm a Scot. Now, over here, we would say ice cream u/ or .- . An iambic ice cream. I'm fairly sure that Americans would have a trochaic ice cream /u or -. Same goes for salad cream, where we stress it like this: ..- . I think in America they'd probably reverse it and say -.. .
    Even more interesting. With the advent of the internet, cable and satellite T.V. and more instant forms of communication, speech patterns change very quickly. It's become fashionable here to raise the voice at the end of each senTENCE? Making each sentence sound like a rhetorical quesTION? I think that started with Australian soap operas, though I believe it's done in America as well. Then, in a matter of weeks, the habit disappears. Something else becomes the fashion. Language patterns have become truly ephemeral. Thanks for the column, and keep up the good work.
  • Dr John Celes
    January 30, 2005
    Edit | Reply

    golden advice

    somehow the free verse and shorter poetic forms have become the fashion of the day and the poets do not care to bother about using the many devices that go into the making of a good poem.so much so that the anything that is emotions expressed in words now gets labelled as poetry which is VERY SAD!good timely reminder that could help to change the sad state of affairs in the field of poetry!

  • DelWarrenLivingston silver member
    January 30, 2005
    Edit | Reply

    priceless information

    Thank-you Erin for your generous willingness to share such an in-depth and detailed part of your vast knowledge with the entire community. I sincerely hope that not only do many many folks come in and read this amazing effort of yours, but they also show some genuine appreciation for having put it on display here for all to gain a measure of insight from.

    Thank-you again...you aretruly a kind person and a treasured friend.

    Sincerely,
    Del
1 - 39 of 39