-
If you want to say hi and you're a furry fan. hello. Or you love vamps. I myself am obsessed with all things lycan and usually furry.
-
I say Hi and I am not a furry fan. Muhuhaha look at me break all the rules. I am a rebel, hear me roar. Take that Man!
-
-
well thanx
for replying anyways -
Hear you roar? Are you sure you're not a furry?
-
-
My fetishes are totally much more like respectible than that. I would like totally take offense but I like totally don't even care what you think because like you're just like a floating head on the like internet and anyway you are just totally jealous of my like supreme awesomeness.
Total 'like's - 7
Total 'totally's - 4
Overall mark - C, missed obvious chance to overcapitalise and spell poorly.
-
-
-
-
Furries are pretty weird.
-
why
why do u say that
-
-
A sub-culture based on people pretending to be anthropomorphic animals?
I don't know why I would say that... -
-
Allow me to reference a relevant xkcd strip.
http://xkcd.com/471/ -
-
Another xkcd referencer! Respect!
-
-
Respect seconded!
-
-
-
-
-
A what and a what now?
-
What?
A furry doesn't have to be used in that connotation. you can just dress furry to be rebellious and not just to act animalistic -
I see fur more rebellious than black.
haha -
-
real fur?
-
-
I g2g but keep posting
BYE -
-
You can just ... go. People will keep posting regardless.
-
-
'Lycans' were first mentioned in the 2003 movie Underworld.
If you want to talk about weres however, message me.
I don't love any 'vamps'. I'm friends with a few vampires on myspace but I don't love them.
I don't know any furries. But they seem to get a LOTTA shit on youtube.
Poor dearies
-
Werewolves/lycans/whatever you want to call them...
They are waayy better than vampires.
The only reason 99% of teenagers prefer vampires is because of Twilight ¬_¬ -
-
No. NOT whatever you want to call them. Lycans are fiction. Lets leave them in a separate catagory.
-
-
Lycans are fictional and werewolves aren't? I'm confused, could you explain?
-
-
Explain?... I can try
Lycans are from the 2003 movie Underworld. They were invented for Hollywood. Some can argue that their origin is a few years earlier in some Anne Rice book. But whatever. That's fiction also.
Werewolves, on the other hand, can be traced back to like forever. And there are many, many individuals today who are (in my opinion) legitimate weres.
Lycans aren't real. But nobody's allowed to tell me that werewolves aren't real. I'm friends with like 4 of them on myspace. And on werelist.com I'm also good friends with many wereferrets, werebears, weretigers etc. Some of these people are fakes. Most aren't. -
-
Lycan is just a slang term for lycanthrope, which is a term that has been used for many years. They're often assumed to be synonymous with werewolf. But lycanthropes don't have to be werewolves, they can be any kind of were.
Lycans aren't just from Underworld or an Anne Rice book a few years earlier. There's a 1937 novel called Lycanthrope. There's a 1962 film called Lycanthropus. The term has been used for centuries in mythology. -
-
Isn't lycanthropy a mental illness? Nobody in their right mind actually believes that they can change form into an animal.
To me, werewolf just means 'person wolf'.
Words are words. Labels are labels. Werewolves, lycanthropy, zoanthropy, therianthropy. I've even heard 'trans species' a few times but I don't like that one so much. I know a guy who I believe in a contherian but he calls himself an animal-person. So whatever. And then there's the five million sub-catagories. Most of which are just for bragging rights.
I don't like any of it. But words like these mean that people can search out others like them very easily so whatever.
The reason that I hate on the word 'lycan' is because it instantly brings to mind the epic battle between weres and vampires and all that shit. It surfaces some rather angry thoughts. -
-
To me, werewolves and lycans are just fictitious creatures. Everyone can believe what they want, I have no problem with that, but until you can show me an animal-person in real life, I need more proof to be convinced.
Most of the time, I type lycan because it's shorter than either lycanthrope or werewolf, and I'm a lazy bugger. -
-
What if being a were is about feeling rather than actual physical changes? If we take it that this term has to do with a person's opinion about themselves then there's no real way to 'prove it'. That's like trying to prove that you're a homosexual or that you feel lonely.
-
-
Point taken. If the term werewolf referred to a feeling, and not a physical change, I would believe that. Like you said, you can't prove it, and it's entirely possible.
-
-
-
-
-
fictional cases of people transforming to animals have existed before written history
-
-
-
-
-
I went to Newfoundland this summer. I asked someone what the caribous ate. She said lichens.
-
-
-
No. Fail.
-
This reminds me of that CSI episode.
"Well, I like hairy chests, but I'm not about to bop a six-foot weasel"
:

Silverfang56
Sep 25 6:37 PM
Reply